"The mainstream media has its own agenda. They do not want to print the facts. They have an agenda, they have a slant, they have a bias. It is outrageous to me"
About this Quote
It’s not an argument so much as a performance of distrust, built to convert frustration into loyalty. Weldon’s repetition of “agenda” functions like a drumbeat: you don’t need evidence if you can create a mood. The line “They do not want to print the facts” quietly flips the burden of proof. If facts aren’t appearing, it’s not because the claim is shaky or the story didn’t clear editorial standards; it’s because “they” are suppressing it. That’s a rhetorically useful conspiracy frame: absence becomes confirmation.
The phrasing also relies on strategic vagueness. “Mainstream media” collapses thousands of editors, producers, and institutions into a single antagonist. “Slant” and “bias” are broad enough to be unfalsifiable, but emotionally specific enough to feel true to anyone who’s felt misrepresented. Notice the escalation: agenda -> slant -> bias -> “outrageous.” It’s a ladder from insinuation to indignation, inviting the audience to share the moral high ground.
Context matters: a politician criticizing the press is almost never only talking about journalism. It’s a preemptive strike against scrutiny, a way to inoculate supporters against future reporting. If a damaging story lands, the audience has already been trained to read it as “their agenda,” not a challenge to the politician’s conduct or claims.
The subtext is transactional: trust me over them. By positioning himself as the aggrieved truth-teller facing a coordinated machine, Weldon converts skepticism into identity. The target isn’t the media’s errors; it’s the audience’s permission to stop listening.
The phrasing also relies on strategic vagueness. “Mainstream media” collapses thousands of editors, producers, and institutions into a single antagonist. “Slant” and “bias” are broad enough to be unfalsifiable, but emotionally specific enough to feel true to anyone who’s felt misrepresented. Notice the escalation: agenda -> slant -> bias -> “outrageous.” It’s a ladder from insinuation to indignation, inviting the audience to share the moral high ground.
Context matters: a politician criticizing the press is almost never only talking about journalism. It’s a preemptive strike against scrutiny, a way to inoculate supporters against future reporting. If a damaging story lands, the audience has already been trained to read it as “their agenda,” not a challenge to the politician’s conduct or claims.
The subtext is transactional: trust me over them. By positioning himself as the aggrieved truth-teller facing a coordinated machine, Weldon converts skepticism into identity. The target isn’t the media’s errors; it’s the audience’s permission to stop listening.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Curt
Add to List



