"The measure would set criminal penalties, the same as those that would apply if harm or death happened to the pregnant woman, for those who harm a fetus"
About this Quote
A neat bit of legislative jujitsu: Ken Calvert frames fetal harm as a mirror image of harm to a pregnant woman, sliding a contested moral claim into the seemingly neutral language of equal protection. The phrasing is doing double duty. On the surface, it sounds like a commonsense upgrade to criminal law - if you assault a pregnant person and the fetus is injured, you should face consequences. Underneath, it quietly argues that a fetus deserves the same juridical standing as the woman carrying it, because the penalties would be "the same."
That symmetry is the point. By anchoring the measure to scenarios most voters find intuitively abhorrent (violence, injury, death), the quote recruits public empathy for a broader legal concept: fetal personhood. It avoids theological or philosophical vocabulary and substitutes the hard metal of criminal penalties, a realm where the state’s power feels justified and urgent. "Those who harm a fetus" is also a strategic vagueness. It implies a clear villain - an attacker, a reckless third party - while leaving unresolved the politically explosive question of whether "those" could ever include the pregnant woman herself or her medical providers.
Context matters: fetal-homicide and fetal-assault bills often ride the same currents as abortion politics, even when presented as victim-protection measures. Calvert’s language is calibrated to that reality. It’s designed to win the argument before it starts by making the fetus legible as a separate victim, then letting the legal system do the rhetorical work.
That symmetry is the point. By anchoring the measure to scenarios most voters find intuitively abhorrent (violence, injury, death), the quote recruits public empathy for a broader legal concept: fetal personhood. It avoids theological or philosophical vocabulary and substitutes the hard metal of criminal penalties, a realm where the state’s power feels justified and urgent. "Those who harm a fetus" is also a strategic vagueness. It implies a clear villain - an attacker, a reckless third party - while leaving unresolved the politically explosive question of whether "those" could ever include the pregnant woman herself or her medical providers.
Context matters: fetal-homicide and fetal-assault bills often ride the same currents as abortion politics, even when presented as victim-protection measures. Calvert’s language is calibrated to that reality. It’s designed to win the argument before it starts by making the fetus legible as a separate victim, then letting the legal system do the rhetorical work.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Ken
Add to List
