"The mind is no match with the heart in persuasion; constitutionality is no match with compassion"
About this Quote
The subtext is tactical. A politician invoking compassion isn’t necessarily rejecting the Constitution; he’s reframing the debate so that legalism sounds cold and emotional urgency sounds brave. “No match” is the tell: it’s not a plea for balance, it’s a declaration of winner and loser. In that framing, opponents who insist on constitutional limits risk being cast as indifferent, even cruel, regardless of their actual motives.
Context matters: Dirksen was a Midwestern Republican power broker in an era when civil rights, Vietnam, and Great Society programs pushed public life into a showdown between rights-as-text and rights-as-lived experience. His career depended on coalition-building and persuasion across ideological lines, and this is persuasion about persuasion. It’s a reminder that politics is rarely a courtroom; it’s a theater of moral stories. Dirksen isn’t just describing how people feel-he’s giving lawmakers permission to choose the argument that lands, even when the argument that’s airtight doesn’t.
Quote Details
| Topic | Kindness |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Dirksen, Everett. (2026, January 15). The mind is no match with the heart in persuasion; constitutionality is no match with compassion. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-mind-is-no-match-with-the-heart-in-persuasion-52376/
Chicago Style
Dirksen, Everett. "The mind is no match with the heart in persuasion; constitutionality is no match with compassion." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-mind-is-no-match-with-the-heart-in-persuasion-52376/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"The mind is no match with the heart in persuasion; constitutionality is no match with compassion." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-mind-is-no-match-with-the-heart-in-persuasion-52376/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.







