"The mongers brought them together upon a mutual surrender of their principles"
About this Quote
The line’s intent is surgical. Toombs isn’t arguing policy; he’s delegitimizing the process by implying that any compromise is a kind of moral liquidation. The choice of "mutual" matters: nobody gets to claim the high ground. Each side is implicated, each party bought, each conscience discounted. It’s a rhetorical move designed to corral the audience into a hard binary - purity or corruption - and to make ideological rigidity feel like integrity rather than obstinacy.
Contextually, Toombs operated in the fevered antebellum world where national bargains over slavery, tariffs, and territorial expansion were constantly being stitched together, then denounced as betrayals. His subtext is a warning and a provocation: if the center can be assembled only by trading away convictions, then the center deserves to collapse. The sentence works because it weaponizes cynicism while posing as virtue, turning "principles" into both moral currency and moral alibi.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Toombs, Robert. (2026, January 16). The mongers brought them together upon a mutual surrender of their principles. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-mongers-brought-them-together-upon-a-mutual-94722/
Chicago Style
Toombs, Robert. "The mongers brought them together upon a mutual surrender of their principles." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-mongers-brought-them-together-upon-a-mutual-94722/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"The mongers brought them together upon a mutual surrender of their principles." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-mongers-brought-them-together-upon-a-mutual-94722/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.






