"The more language is a living operation, the less we are aware of it. Thus it follows from the self-forgetfulness of language that its real being consists in what is said in it"
About this Quote
Gadamer is coming for the fantasy that language is a neutral tool you pick up, use, and put back down. If language is really alive, he argues, you do not notice it the way you do a wrench or a menu interface. You notice it most when it breaks: the awkward translation, the stilted bureaucratese, the moment you cannot find the word and suddenly feel the scaffolding. Fluency is invisibility. That is his opening move, and it’s quietly devastating to any philosophy that treats meaning as something we manufacture privately and then “encode” into sentences.
The subtext is hermeneutic: understanding isn’t a side activity we apply to language from the outside; it happens through language, inside a shared historical world. “Self-forgetfulness” sounds mystical, but it’s actually a hard claim about how meaning works. In ordinary speech, we aren’t primarily aware of grammar, phonemes, or even “language” as an object. We’re oriented toward the matter at hand. That’s why he says language’s “real being” is not in rules or dictionaries but in what gets said - in the event of utterance, the live exchange where something becomes intelligible.
Context matters: Gadamer is writing in the shadow of Heidegger’s “language speaks” and in argument with the scientistic urge to treat interpretation like method. Against the idea that you can secure meaning by formal control, he insists meaning is enacted, contingent, socially inherited. The line reads like a calm observation; it’s also a polemic: stop hunting for language’s essence in metalanguage. Look at how speech makes a world appear, and how easily that world carries you without your noticing the medium doing the carrying.
The subtext is hermeneutic: understanding isn’t a side activity we apply to language from the outside; it happens through language, inside a shared historical world. “Self-forgetfulness” sounds mystical, but it’s actually a hard claim about how meaning works. In ordinary speech, we aren’t primarily aware of grammar, phonemes, or even “language” as an object. We’re oriented toward the matter at hand. That’s why he says language’s “real being” is not in rules or dictionaries but in what gets said - in the event of utterance, the live exchange where something becomes intelligible.
Context matters: Gadamer is writing in the shadow of Heidegger’s “language speaks” and in argument with the scientistic urge to treat interpretation like method. Against the idea that you can secure meaning by formal control, he insists meaning is enacted, contingent, socially inherited. The line reads like a calm observation; it’s also a polemic: stop hunting for language’s essence in metalanguage. Look at how speech makes a world appear, and how easily that world carries you without your noticing the medium doing the carrying.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Hans-Georg
Add to List
