"The more rapidly a civilization progresses, the sooner it dies for another to rise in its place"
About this Quote
Progress, in Ellis's framing, isn't a victory lap; it's an accelerant. The line has the fatalistic snap of early-20th-century social science, when "civilization" was treated less like a set of ideals than like an organism with a lifespan. Ellis, a psychologist who wrote widely on sex, culture, and "modern nerves", aims at a counterintuitive idea: that what looks like forward motion can also be self-consuming speed.
The intent is partly diagnostic, partly admonitory. Rapid advancement concentrates change into a single generation: technologies outpace institutions, cities swell faster than customs can adapt, appetites multiply before ethics and governance learn restraint. Ellis is suspicious of acceleration itself. The implied mechanism isn't that progress is "bad", but that it destabilizes the cultural immune system - shared meanings, rituals, and limits - that makes a society coherent. When those lag, a civilization doesn't just evolve; it fragments, making room for a successor with a fresher story and a tighter grip on legitimacy.
The subtext carries a cyclical, almost Spenglerian mood (The Decline of the West lands in 1918): history as replacement, not redemption. It also reflects fin-de-siecle anxieties about decadence, degeneration, and overstimulation - the sense that modern life is a constant stress test for psyche and polity alike. Ellis turns "progress" into a memento mori: every breakthrough is also a break with the past, and too many breaks, too quickly, can become a collapse. The sting is that the "another" rising isn't necessarily better - just better adapted to the new tempo.
The intent is partly diagnostic, partly admonitory. Rapid advancement concentrates change into a single generation: technologies outpace institutions, cities swell faster than customs can adapt, appetites multiply before ethics and governance learn restraint. Ellis is suspicious of acceleration itself. The implied mechanism isn't that progress is "bad", but that it destabilizes the cultural immune system - shared meanings, rituals, and limits - that makes a society coherent. When those lag, a civilization doesn't just evolve; it fragments, making room for a successor with a fresher story and a tighter grip on legitimacy.
The subtext carries a cyclical, almost Spenglerian mood (The Decline of the West lands in 1918): history as replacement, not redemption. It also reflects fin-de-siecle anxieties about decadence, degeneration, and overstimulation - the sense that modern life is a constant stress test for psyche and polity alike. Ellis turns "progress" into a memento mori: every breakthrough is also a break with the past, and too many breaks, too quickly, can become a collapse. The sting is that the "another" rising isn't necessarily better - just better adapted to the new tempo.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Havelock
Add to List








