"The more we are consuming oil that either comes from places that are bent on our destruction or helping those who are... the more we are enabling those who are trying to kill us"
About this Quote
Gaffney’s line is built to make energy policy feel like self-defense, not economics. By stacking “consuming oil” with “bent on our destruction,” he collapses a sprawling global supply chain into a moral melodrama: every fill-up becomes an involuntary donation to the enemy. The phrasing is intentionally breathless, almost accumulative, using repetition (“the more... the more...”) to mimic inevitability. You don’t just buy gas; you “enable” murder. That verb is the engine here: it shifts responsibility from distant regimes to ordinary citizens and policymakers, turning a market choice into a complicity claim.
The subtext is a familiar post-9/11 script of contamination and dependency. “Places” is vague on purpose, letting the listener plug in whichever adversary is politically useful at the moment - Middle Eastern states, Iran, Russia, any convenient villain - while “helping those who are” widens the net to include allies, trading partners, and anyone insufficiently aligned. The argument doesn’t need specificity; it needs a target-rich atmosphere.
Context matters: Gaffney, long associated with national security hawkishness and hardline Islam-focused framing, is speaking from a tradition that treats vulnerability as the central American sin. Energy independence becomes not just strategic but cleansing. The quote works because it weaponizes fear and guilt simultaneously, offering a simple story where complex tradeoffs are suspect and compromise looks like collaboration. It’s less a policy critique than a loyalty test: if you disagree, you’re not merely wrong - you’re assisting “those who are trying to kill us.”
The subtext is a familiar post-9/11 script of contamination and dependency. “Places” is vague on purpose, letting the listener plug in whichever adversary is politically useful at the moment - Middle Eastern states, Iran, Russia, any convenient villain - while “helping those who are” widens the net to include allies, trading partners, and anyone insufficiently aligned. The argument doesn’t need specificity; it needs a target-rich atmosphere.
Context matters: Gaffney, long associated with national security hawkishness and hardline Islam-focused framing, is speaking from a tradition that treats vulnerability as the central American sin. Energy independence becomes not just strategic but cleansing. The quote works because it weaponizes fear and guilt simultaneously, offering a simple story where complex tradeoffs are suspect and compromise looks like collaboration. It’s less a policy critique than a loyalty test: if you disagree, you’re not merely wrong - you’re assisting “those who are trying to kill us.”
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Frank
Add to List


