"The more we get out of the world the less we leave, and in the long run we shall have to pay our debts at a time that may be very inconvenient for our own survival"
About this Quote
Wiener, the patron saint of cybernetics, frames ecology like a balance sheet and dares you to feel the moral chill of the math. The line is engineered to puncture a very modern fantasy: that extraction can be cleanly separated from consequence. “The more we get out of the world” sounds like progress talk - growth, efficiency, optimization - but he flips it into a loss function: every gain is also depletion, every “out” implies something no longer “in” the system.
The subtext is a critique of short-termism dressed up as rational accounting. “Less we leave” isn’t just about resources; it’s about options. A society that treats the planet as an input stream is also shrinking its future degrees of freedom, the same way a feedback system becomes unstable when it ignores the signals it doesn’t like. Wiener’s signature move is smuggling ethics into engineering language: debts accumulate whether or not you believe in morality, because the universe keeps records in physical constraints.
Then he tightens the vise with “pay our debts” and “very inconvenient,” a dry understatement that lands like satire. Inconvenient for whom? Not for some abstract “economy,” but “our own survival.” The punchline is that the bill arrives on biology’s schedule, not ours. Written in the mid-20th century, amid postwar industrial acceleration and Wiener’s anxieties about automated systems and militarized science, the warning reads less like pastoral environmentalism and more like systems analysis: you can’t indefinitely externalize costs in a closed world. Eventually the externality becomes the environment you’re trying to live in.
The subtext is a critique of short-termism dressed up as rational accounting. “Less we leave” isn’t just about resources; it’s about options. A society that treats the planet as an input stream is also shrinking its future degrees of freedom, the same way a feedback system becomes unstable when it ignores the signals it doesn’t like. Wiener’s signature move is smuggling ethics into engineering language: debts accumulate whether or not you believe in morality, because the universe keeps records in physical constraints.
Then he tightens the vise with “pay our debts” and “very inconvenient,” a dry understatement that lands like satire. Inconvenient for whom? Not for some abstract “economy,” but “our own survival.” The punchline is that the bill arrives on biology’s schedule, not ours. Written in the mid-20th century, amid postwar industrial acceleration and Wiener’s anxieties about automated systems and militarized science, the warning reads less like pastoral environmentalism and more like systems analysis: you can’t indefinitely externalize costs in a closed world. Eventually the externality becomes the environment you’re trying to live in.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Norbert
Add to List






