"The most difficult thing for me is a portrait. You have to try and put your camera between the skin of a person and his shirt"
About this Quote
Portraiture, for Cartier-Bresson, isn’t a genre so much as a moral trespass. That line about slipping the camera “between the skin of a person and his shirt” takes the cozy rhetoric of “capturing someone’s essence” and turns it into something tactile, invasive, almost surgical. The shirt is what we choose to show: class signals, style, self-presentation, the armor of public identity. The skin is the unedited fact of a person: vulnerability, fatigue, desire, fear. He’s admitting that the portrait asks the photographer to breach that boundary, to get closer than etiquette allows.
The intent is partly technical (how to make a face look like a life instead of a pose) and partly ethical: the photographer must negotiate access. Cartier-Bresson’s famous preference for candidness and the “decisive moment” sits behind this. In the street, people are busy being themselves; in a portrait, they perform being themselves. The subtext is a critique of the studio’s polite lies, where lighting and direction can leave you with a flawless shirt and no skin.
Context matters: he worked in a century when cameras became portable, fast, and socially nimble, enabling a new intimacy with strangers and public figures alike. His metaphor acknowledges the power imbalance built into that intimacy. A great portrait, he suggests, is not made by flattering someone’s surface, but by earning (or stealing) a brief passage past it.
The intent is partly technical (how to make a face look like a life instead of a pose) and partly ethical: the photographer must negotiate access. Cartier-Bresson’s famous preference for candidness and the “decisive moment” sits behind this. In the street, people are busy being themselves; in a portrait, they perform being themselves. The subtext is a critique of the studio’s polite lies, where lighting and direction can leave you with a flawless shirt and no skin.
Context matters: he worked in a century when cameras became portable, fast, and socially nimble, enabling a new intimacy with strangers and public figures alike. His metaphor acknowledges the power imbalance built into that intimacy. A great portrait, he suggests, is not made by flattering someone’s surface, but by earning (or stealing) a brief passage past it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Henri
Add to List

