"The most important element of a free society, where individual rights are held in the highest esteem, is the rejection of the initiation of violence"
About this Quote
Liberty, in Ron Pauls telling, isnt a warm feeling or a grab-bag of rights; its a hard rule about force. By naming "the initiation of violence" as the thing a free society must reject, he smuggles a whole worldview into a single moral boundary: coercion is the original sin, and politics is mainly the art of disguising it.
The phrasing matters. "Initiation" is doing a lot of ideological labor. It implies a clean distinction between aggression and defense, between using force and responding to it. That distinction lets Paul argue for a minimal state while still sounding tough-minded: police and courts can exist, but only as shields, never as tools for engineering outcomes. In other words, government is legitimate only when it acts like a referee, not a player.
The subtext is a broad indictment of modern governance without naming any particular villain. Taxes become suspect (compelled transfer), regulation becomes suspect (compelled behavior), foreign intervention becomes suspect (state violence abroad). Even well-meaning social policy is recast as violence by another name. Its a move that turns debates about welfare or markets into debates about morality: not "does it work?" but "is it coercion?"
Context sharpens the intent. Paul rose as the most consistent libertarian voice in a Republican Party increasingly comfortable with surveillance, policing, and war after 9/11. This line is a rebuke aimed at both parties: if you celebrate rights while normalizing preemptive force, youre not defending freedom; youre redefining it to fit power.
The phrasing matters. "Initiation" is doing a lot of ideological labor. It implies a clean distinction between aggression and defense, between using force and responding to it. That distinction lets Paul argue for a minimal state while still sounding tough-minded: police and courts can exist, but only as shields, never as tools for engineering outcomes. In other words, government is legitimate only when it acts like a referee, not a player.
The subtext is a broad indictment of modern governance without naming any particular villain. Taxes become suspect (compelled transfer), regulation becomes suspect (compelled behavior), foreign intervention becomes suspect (state violence abroad). Even well-meaning social policy is recast as violence by another name. Its a move that turns debates about welfare or markets into debates about morality: not "does it work?" but "is it coercion?"
Context sharpens the intent. Paul rose as the most consistent libertarian voice in a Republican Party increasingly comfortable with surveillance, policing, and war after 9/11. This line is a rebuke aimed at both parties: if you celebrate rights while normalizing preemptive force, youre not defending freedom; youre redefining it to fit power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Ron
Add to List
