"The most significant indicator that there is no disaster in Iraq is the fact that there is no exodus"
About this Quote
Assad’s line is a masterclass in authoritarian minimization: take a complex, morally loaded catastrophe and reduce it to a single, supposedly objective metric. “No exodus” is offered as a clean, almost technocratic proof that “there is no disaster.” It’s persuasion by accounting: if the numbers aren’t visibly moving, nothing is wrong.
The intent is less about Iraq than about insulating his own regime from the contagious legitimacy crisis of the post-2003 region. In the mid-2000s, Iraq’s implosion was the cautionary tale Western leaders used to justify intervention (“remove the dictator, unleash chaos”), and Syrian officials used to discredit it (“see what democracy looks like”). Assad’s claim tries to lock in the second interpretation. If Iraq isn’t a disaster, then the American project isn’t an obvious failure; and if the American project isn’t a failure, Damascus can position itself as the sober realist amid hysteria, not the next domino.
The subtext is also darker: refugees are treated as political instruments. “Exodus” isn’t human suffering; it’s a headline, a visible embarrassment, a destabilizing flow across borders. The line quietly shifts the moral burden away from violence and onto optics. It implies that a catastrophe only counts when bodies move in a way that inconveniences states.
Rhetorically, it’s built to sound empirical while being aggressively selective. Disasters can trap people as easily as they can displace them; fear, poverty, checkpoints, and closed borders all suppress flight. Assad’s sentence works because it weaponizes common sense against the very complexity that common sense can’t measure.
The intent is less about Iraq than about insulating his own regime from the contagious legitimacy crisis of the post-2003 region. In the mid-2000s, Iraq’s implosion was the cautionary tale Western leaders used to justify intervention (“remove the dictator, unleash chaos”), and Syrian officials used to discredit it (“see what democracy looks like”). Assad’s claim tries to lock in the second interpretation. If Iraq isn’t a disaster, then the American project isn’t an obvious failure; and if the American project isn’t a failure, Damascus can position itself as the sober realist amid hysteria, not the next domino.
The subtext is also darker: refugees are treated as political instruments. “Exodus” isn’t human suffering; it’s a headline, a visible embarrassment, a destabilizing flow across borders. The line quietly shifts the moral burden away from violence and onto optics. It implies that a catastrophe only counts when bodies move in a way that inconveniences states.
Rhetorically, it’s built to sound empirical while being aggressively selective. Disasters can trap people as easily as they can displace them; fear, poverty, checkpoints, and closed borders all suppress flight. Assad’s sentence works because it weaponizes common sense against the very complexity that common sense can’t measure.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Bashar
Add to List
