"The motivation for war is simple. The U.S. government started the war with Iraq in order to make it easy for U.S. corporations to do business in other countries. They intend to use cheap labor in those countries, which will make Americans rich"

Michael Moore, a popular filmmaker and political analyst, is known for his outspoken views on U.S. diplomacy and financial interests. In this quote, Moore presents an important analysis of the inspirations behind the U.S. involvement in the Iraq War. He suggests that the main reason for the war is not the openly specified objectives, such as the elimination of weapons of mass destruction or spreading democracy, however rather financial gain for American corporations.

Moore indicates that the conflict in Iraq was managed to develop an environment favorable to U.S. business interests, recommending that once political instability or routine change occurs, American companies can more easily penetrate these markets. The argument rests on the concept that war can take apart existing barriers that might hamper U.S. businesses from accessing these markets, such as restrictive nationwide policies or unfavorable trade contracts.

The phrase "cheap labor" even more illustrates Moore's point of view on globalization, where he intimates a financial technique where corporations exploit labor markets in other countries for monetary gain. By establishing themselves in these areas post-conflict, business can gain from lower salaries compared to those in the U.S., consequently lowering operational expenses and increasing their profit margins. Moore's assertion that this technique "will make Americans abundant" seems to highlight the disparity in between corporate profits and more comprehensive nationwide interest. It recommends that the wealth created advantages a little segment of American society, mainly those tied to major corporations, instead of the basic populace.

In general, Moore's perspective is a review of what he deems corporate-driven diplomacy, whereby financial interests overshadow human and democratic values. This analysis calls attention to the intricate interaction of politics, economics, and principles in global relations, motivating a reassessment of the real inspirations behind military engagements.