"The need to help spread democracy and the ability to do that will be much greater if we break this addiction to oil, which gives the oil princes and sultans the power in the Mideast"
About this Quote
Inslee frames climate policy as national-security realism, not moral lifestyle branding. “Addiction to oil” is doing a lot of rhetorical work: it recasts fossil-fuel dependence as a loss of agency, a compulsion that weakens the country’s strategic posture. The phrase also dodges the technocratic weeds of energy policy by giving the problem a villainous clarity. You don’t negotiate with an addiction; you quit.
The second move is geopolitical jiu-jitsu. Rather than treating democracy promotion as a crusade of values, he sells it as something you can only do effectively once you’ve changed the incentive structure. Oil wealth, in this telling, isn’t just money; it’s leverage. “Princes and sultans” is pointed language that compresses a messy region into a recognizable archetype of hereditary power, implying that petrostates can resist reform because global demand keeps them flush, insulated, and indispensable.
There’s subtext aimed at domestic skeptics: renewable energy isn’t simply about polar bears or carbon parts per million; it’s about not having to swallow authoritarian bargains at the gas pump. The line also tucks in a critique of U.S. hypocrisy. You can’t preach democratic norms while underwriting autocratic stability through energy purchases and the military commitments that follow.
Context matters: post-9/11 politics and the Iraq-era hangover made “democracy in the Middle East” both a talking point and a sore spot. Inslee’s intent is to launder that ambition through energy independence, making democracy promotion sound less like intervention and more like removing the financial oxygen that keeps undemocratic regimes comfortable.
The second move is geopolitical jiu-jitsu. Rather than treating democracy promotion as a crusade of values, he sells it as something you can only do effectively once you’ve changed the incentive structure. Oil wealth, in this telling, isn’t just money; it’s leverage. “Princes and sultans” is pointed language that compresses a messy region into a recognizable archetype of hereditary power, implying that petrostates can resist reform because global demand keeps them flush, insulated, and indispensable.
There’s subtext aimed at domestic skeptics: renewable energy isn’t simply about polar bears or carbon parts per million; it’s about not having to swallow authoritarian bargains at the gas pump. The line also tucks in a critique of U.S. hypocrisy. You can’t preach democratic norms while underwriting autocratic stability through energy purchases and the military commitments that follow.
Context matters: post-9/11 politics and the Iraq-era hangover made “democracy in the Middle East” both a talking point and a sore spot. Inslee’s intent is to launder that ambition through energy independence, making democracy promotion sound less like intervention and more like removing the financial oxygen that keeps undemocratic regimes comfortable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Jay
Add to List
