Politics & Power Quote by Tim Yeo

Yeo’s line is an attempt to launder urgency through ideology: if climate change is framed as “naturally Conservative,” it stops being a culture-war concession and becomes a home-field issue. The forecast - “there won’t be a week” without discussion - is doing quiet political triage. It treats climate not as a single policy fight but as a permanent condition of governance, like inflation or migration: something that will keep intruding, legislatively and electorally, whether Conservatives like it or not.

Calling it “naturally Conservative” is the rhetorical judo move. It tries to detach climate action from left-coded signals (internationalism, regulation, moralizing) and reattach it to Conservative virtues: stewardship, prudence, risk management, national resilience, energy security. Subtext: the party can either own this terrain or be dragged across it. There’s also a warning embedded in the calendar. “The next four years” suggests an incoming parliament where climate pressure will spike - from extreme weather, legal constraints, EU and global commitments, or a shifting business consensus. He’s telling colleagues that denial is not a strategy, it’s an abdication.

The line’s finesse is that it offers Conservatives a way to change without “changing”: to justify policy evolution as a return to first principles rather than capitulation. But it also reveals anxiety. If climate becomes unavoidable weekly fare, the political cost of looking unserious rises fast, and the Conservative brand - competence, stability, realism - is exactly what’s at stake.