"The next morning we saw nothing of the enemy, though we were still lying to"
About this Quote
Byng’s context sharpens the edge. As a British naval officer (and in effect a soldier of empire) best remembered for the Minorca fiasco and his subsequent execution “to encourage the others,” he occupies a historical role where language becomes evidence. After a failed engagement, every verb gets interrogated: did you press? did you pursue? did you take initiative? “We saw nothing” can sound like prudence, but it can also read as an alibi: you can’t fight what you can’t see. “Still lying to” implies discipline and seamanship, yet it also signals a choice to remain static.
The subtext is a portrait of command under political scrutiny: the enemy may be absent, but judgment isn’t. Byng’s phrasing anticipates the court-martial logic that would later devour him, where hesitation is reframed as dereliction. It’s bureaucratic language trying to look like plain speech - and failing just enough to reveal the fear underneath.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Byng, John. (2026, January 15). The next morning we saw nothing of the enemy, though we were still lying to. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-next-morning-we-saw-nothing-of-the-enemy-151775/
Chicago Style
Byng, John. "The next morning we saw nothing of the enemy, though we were still lying to." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-next-morning-we-saw-nothing-of-the-enemy-151775/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"The next morning we saw nothing of the enemy, though we were still lying to." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-next-morning-we-saw-nothing-of-the-enemy-151775/. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.





