"The nineteenth century was completely lacking in logic, it had cosmic terms and hopes, and aspirations, and discoveries, and ideals but it had no logic"
About this Quote
Stein’s jab at the nineteenth century lands like a scalpel because it refuses the era its favorite self-portrait: a triumphant march of Reason. She inventories the century’s grand nouns - “cosmic terms and hopes, and aspirations, and discoveries, and ideals” - then punctures them with a blunt verdict: “but it had no logic.” The rhythm matters. That piling-on of abstractions mimics the Victorian habit of stacking progress myths until they feel inevitable. Her final clause doesn’t merely contradict the list; it reframes it as clutter, a kind of ornate intellectual furniture that never quite supports the weight it promises to bear.
The subtext is modernist impatience with a century that could name everything and still not know what it was doing. Stein wrote from inside the twentieth century’s disillusionments - mechanized war, mass politics, psychoanalysis, new physics - after the old certainties had curdled. Calling the nineteenth century “completely lacking in logic” is less a factual claim than a critique of its confidence: an age that believed it could harmonize industry, empire, morality, and science into one coherent story. Stein implies the story never cohered; it just sounded coherent because the vocabulary was so majestic.
There’s also a sly self-portrait here. Stein’s own work explodes inherited narrative “logic” in favor of repetition, surface, and radical attention. Her complaint isn’t that the nineteenth century lacked rational tools; it’s that it mistook ambition for structure. The sentence reads like a modernist verdict on the Victorian psyche: soaring, encyclopedic, rhetorically overfurnished - and secretly unworkable.
The subtext is modernist impatience with a century that could name everything and still not know what it was doing. Stein wrote from inside the twentieth century’s disillusionments - mechanized war, mass politics, psychoanalysis, new physics - after the old certainties had curdled. Calling the nineteenth century “completely lacking in logic” is less a factual claim than a critique of its confidence: an age that believed it could harmonize industry, empire, morality, and science into one coherent story. Stein implies the story never cohered; it just sounded coherent because the vocabulary was so majestic.
There’s also a sly self-portrait here. Stein’s own work explodes inherited narrative “logic” in favor of repetition, surface, and radical attention. Her complaint isn’t that the nineteenth century lacked rational tools; it’s that it mistook ambition for structure. The sentence reads like a modernist verdict on the Victorian psyche: soaring, encyclopedic, rhetorically overfurnished - and secretly unworkable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Gertrude
Add to List


