"The obvious issue is providing clean drinking water and sanitation to every single human being on earth at the cost of little more than one year of the Kyoto treaty"
About this Quote
Lomborg’s line is engineered to make climate policy feel like a budgeting error, not a moral crusade. By calling the problem of clean water and sanitation “obvious,” he frames it as low-drama, high-certainty triage: a basic intervention with immediate, measurable returns. Then he springs the comparison trap: “little more than one year of the Kyoto treaty.” The subtext is that global warming policy is an expensive prestige project while preventable disease is the scandal hiding in plain sight.
It works because it weaponizes scale. Kyoto becomes a single, legible price tag, even though the treaty’s costs and benefits are sprawling, contested, and distributed unevenly across countries and decades. “One year” is doing rhetorical heavy lifting: it shrinks climate action to an annual line item, inviting readers to imagine a clean swap - stop paying for abstract future gains, start paying for concrete present lives. The phrase “every single human being” pushes the point into absolutist territory, where the moral math seems undeniable.
The context is Lomborg’s brand of “smart prioritization,” often associated with cost-benefit skepticism toward sweeping climate commitments. He’s not just arguing for water and sanitation; he’s arguing against a certain kind of climate politics that trades in apocalyptic urgency. The intent is provocation: to force elites who signal virtue through climate treaties to answer a humiliating question about opportunity cost - if you can save millions now, why are you buying insurance for later at luxury prices?
It works because it weaponizes scale. Kyoto becomes a single, legible price tag, even though the treaty’s costs and benefits are sprawling, contested, and distributed unevenly across countries and decades. “One year” is doing rhetorical heavy lifting: it shrinks climate action to an annual line item, inviting readers to imagine a clean swap - stop paying for abstract future gains, start paying for concrete present lives. The phrase “every single human being” pushes the point into absolutist territory, where the moral math seems undeniable.
The context is Lomborg’s brand of “smart prioritization,” often associated with cost-benefit skepticism toward sweeping climate commitments. He’s not just arguing for water and sanitation; he’s arguing against a certain kind of climate politics that trades in apocalyptic urgency. The intent is provocation: to force elites who signal virtue through climate treaties to answer a humiliating question about opportunity cost - if you can save millions now, why are you buying insurance for later at luxury prices?
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Bjorn
Add to List



