"The one process now going on that will take millions of years to correct is the loss of genetic and species diversity by the destruction of natural habitats. This is the folly our descendants are least likely to forgive us"
About this Quote
Wilson is doing something scientists rarely allow themselves on the page: he’s assigning moral weight to a graph. The line “millions of years to correct” isn’t a flourish so much as a time-scale weapon, yanking environmental damage out of the news cycle and into deep time. By framing biodiversity loss as a “process now going on,” he punctures the comforting fantasy that extinction is an occasional tragedy instead of a system-wide, human-driven momentum.
The phrasing is surgical. “Correct” implies nature has a baseline order and resilience, but it also quietly admits that resilience is glacial. Ecosystems can rebound after fires and storms; they cannot speed-run speciation. Wilson’s real target is the modern belief that technology can patch anything: that conservation is a lifestyle preference rather than a civilizational obligation. Habitat destruction becomes not a side effect of progress but progress’s hidden invoice.
Then comes the pivot from biology to judgment. “Folly” is an old word with a sting: not evil, not ignorance, but willful stupidity in the face of available knowledge. He’s indicting a society that can map genomes and still bulldoze the libraries those genomes live in. The “descendants” clause is a rhetorical trapdoor, shifting the audience from present-day stakeholders to future jurors. Climate change carries obvious self-interest; biodiversity loss reads as theft from people who can’t vote yet. Wilson’s subtext is that history won’t just ask what we knew, but why we chose convenience over inheritance.
The phrasing is surgical. “Correct” implies nature has a baseline order and resilience, but it also quietly admits that resilience is glacial. Ecosystems can rebound after fires and storms; they cannot speed-run speciation. Wilson’s real target is the modern belief that technology can patch anything: that conservation is a lifestyle preference rather than a civilizational obligation. Habitat destruction becomes not a side effect of progress but progress’s hidden invoice.
Then comes the pivot from biology to judgment. “Folly” is an old word with a sting: not evil, not ignorance, but willful stupidity in the face of available knowledge. He’s indicting a society that can map genomes and still bulldoze the libraries those genomes live in. The “descendants” clause is a rhetorical trapdoor, shifting the audience from present-day stakeholders to future jurors. Climate change carries obvious self-interest; biodiversity loss reads as theft from people who can’t vote yet. Wilson’s subtext is that history won’t just ask what we knew, but why we chose convenience over inheritance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | E. O. Wilson, The Diversity of Life (1992). Attribution: passage on loss of genetic and species diversity by habitat destruction. |
More Quotes by O. Wilson
Add to List

