"The only solid and lasting peace between a man and his wife is, doubtless, a separation"
About this Quote
With dry aristocratic wit, Lord Chesterfield insists that the only reliable marital peace is achieved by parting. The line works as a provocation and as a worldly observation from a man who prized manners as a social lubricant and distrusted the durability of private harmony. If politeness is a mask that keeps civil society running, it is hardest to maintain at home, where familiarity strips away ceremony and exposes irritation, tedium, and power struggles. Separation, then, restores distance, and with it the chance for courtesy to reappear; absence accomplishes what intimacy cannot.
The remark also reflects the structure of marriage in 18th-century Britain, especially among elites. Marriages were often strategic alignments of wealth and status rather than romantic unions. Divorce was nearly unattainable without an act of Parliament, while informal separations were common, discreetly managed, and sometimes tacitly accepted. Within that world, peace often meant the avoidance of scandal rather than the achievement of mutual understanding. Chesterfield, famed for polished cynicism and pragmatic counsel in his Letters, reduces a revered institution to a transaction managed best by calculated distance.
There is hyperbole here, but not mere flippancy. The aphorism presses on the distinction between peace and concord. Peace can be the absence of open conflict; concord is the presence of genuine harmony. Chesterfield implies that for many couples, especially those bound by convenience or habit, the former is attainable only by removing the daily friction that intimacy guarantees. The line aligns with the moralists of his age, like La Rochefoucauld, who delighted in exposing self-love beneath noble pretense.
Read another way, the sentence is a warning about the fragility of domestic civility. If peace requires separation, then sustained harmony would demand continual acts of tact, self-restraint, and generosity that few practice consistently. The sting remains contemporary: when performance collapses and goodwill thins, distance often feels like the only honest truce.
The remark also reflects the structure of marriage in 18th-century Britain, especially among elites. Marriages were often strategic alignments of wealth and status rather than romantic unions. Divorce was nearly unattainable without an act of Parliament, while informal separations were common, discreetly managed, and sometimes tacitly accepted. Within that world, peace often meant the avoidance of scandal rather than the achievement of mutual understanding. Chesterfield, famed for polished cynicism and pragmatic counsel in his Letters, reduces a revered institution to a transaction managed best by calculated distance.
There is hyperbole here, but not mere flippancy. The aphorism presses on the distinction between peace and concord. Peace can be the absence of open conflict; concord is the presence of genuine harmony. Chesterfield implies that for many couples, especially those bound by convenience or habit, the former is attainable only by removing the daily friction that intimacy guarantees. The line aligns with the moralists of his age, like La Rochefoucauld, who delighted in exposing self-love beneath noble pretense.
Read another way, the sentence is a warning about the fragility of domestic civility. If peace requires separation, then sustained harmony would demand continual acts of tact, self-restraint, and generosity that few practice consistently. The sting remains contemporary: when performance collapses and goodwill thins, distance often feels like the only honest truce.
Quote Details
| Topic | Divorce |
|---|
More Quotes by Lord
Add to List
