"The other great development has been in photography, but that too was influenced by Conceptual art"
About this Quote
LeWitt slips a provocation into an almost offhand sentence: the biggest shifts in photography weren’t born in the darkroom, but in the idea. Coming from a central architect of Conceptual art, the line is both territorial claim and quiet thesis statement. He’s reframing “development” away from sharper lenses or finer grain and toward a change in what photographs are allowed to be: not just images, but propositions.
The phrasing matters. “But that too” treats photography as one more medium that had to answer Conceptualism’s challenge. It’s a demotion and a reveal: demotion because photography, often mythologized as modernity’s truth machine, becomes a follower; reveal because LeWitt understands how perfectly the camera serves Conceptualism’s anti-romantic agenda. If the artwork is the plan, the system, the instruction, then photography becomes the ideal courier - efficient, repeatable, allegedly neutral. The artist’s hand retreats; the idea steps forward.
Context does the rest. By the late 1960s and 1970s, Conceptual artists used photographs as documents, evidence, or serial records: pictures that look plain on purpose. That aesthetic “plainness” wasn’t a lack of ambition; it was a strategy to drain the image of aura and push viewers to read structure, sequence, and intent. LeWitt’s subtext is a gentle insistence that what many call photographic innovation - typologies, deadpan style, process-based series, even the rise of art-photo as discourse - is indebted to a moment when art decided that meaning could be assembled like an argument.
It’s also self-defense. If Conceptual art gets dismissed as cerebral, LeWitt counters by pointing to its afterlife: it didn’t just change galleries; it rewired how culture pictures the world.
The phrasing matters. “But that too” treats photography as one more medium that had to answer Conceptualism’s challenge. It’s a demotion and a reveal: demotion because photography, often mythologized as modernity’s truth machine, becomes a follower; reveal because LeWitt understands how perfectly the camera serves Conceptualism’s anti-romantic agenda. If the artwork is the plan, the system, the instruction, then photography becomes the ideal courier - efficient, repeatable, allegedly neutral. The artist’s hand retreats; the idea steps forward.
Context does the rest. By the late 1960s and 1970s, Conceptual artists used photographs as documents, evidence, or serial records: pictures that look plain on purpose. That aesthetic “plainness” wasn’t a lack of ambition; it was a strategy to drain the image of aura and push viewers to read structure, sequence, and intent. LeWitt’s subtext is a gentle insistence that what many call photographic innovation - typologies, deadpan style, process-based series, even the rise of art-photo as discourse - is indebted to a moment when art decided that meaning could be assembled like an argument.
It’s also self-defense. If Conceptual art gets dismissed as cerebral, LeWitt counters by pointing to its afterlife: it didn’t just change galleries; it rewired how culture pictures the world.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Sol
Add to List







