"The overwhelming majority of theories are rejected because they contain bad explanations, not because they fail experimental tests"
About this Quote
Deutsch is poking at a comforting myth about science: that experiments are the main executioner, cleanly beheading wrong ideas in a courtroom of data. His line flips the drama. Most theories, he argues, die earlier and quieter, because they never earn the right to be tested. They’re vague, patchy, stuffed with escape hatches, or so overfit to a narrow set of facts that they explain everything and therefore nothing. The scandal isn’t that nature refuses them; it’s that they refuse to make themselves vulnerable to nature in the first place.
The intent is partly methodological and partly philosophical. Deutsch, coming out of the Popper tradition and his own “constructor theory” ambitions, treats good explanations as the real currency of progress. A “bad explanation” isn’t merely false; it’s non-generative. It doesn’t constrain what should happen next, doesn’t unify disparate phenomena, doesn’t survive contact with new questions. Experimental tests matter, but only after a theory has paid the entry fee: clarity, scope, and a capacity to be wrong in a specific way.
The subtext is a warning aimed at modern knowledge industries that fetishize “evidence-based” branding while tolerating theories that are rhetorically bulletproof. If you can always blame “unobserved variables,” “measurement limitations,” or “context,” you can keep your theory alive indefinitely - at the cost of insight. Deutsch is insisting that science is not just a pile of results; it’s an aesthetic and ethical discipline of explanation, where the first filter is intellectual honesty, not laboratory machinery.
The intent is partly methodological and partly philosophical. Deutsch, coming out of the Popper tradition and his own “constructor theory” ambitions, treats good explanations as the real currency of progress. A “bad explanation” isn’t merely false; it’s non-generative. It doesn’t constrain what should happen next, doesn’t unify disparate phenomena, doesn’t survive contact with new questions. Experimental tests matter, but only after a theory has paid the entry fee: clarity, scope, and a capacity to be wrong in a specific way.
The subtext is a warning aimed at modern knowledge industries that fetishize “evidence-based” branding while tolerating theories that are rhetorically bulletproof. If you can always blame “unobserved variables,” “measurement limitations,” or “context,” you can keep your theory alive indefinitely - at the cost of insight. Deutsch is insisting that science is not just a pile of results; it’s an aesthetic and ethical discipline of explanation, where the first filter is intellectual honesty, not laboratory machinery.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by David
Add to List




