"The path we have chosen is constitutional"
About this Quote
“The path we have chosen is constitutional” is a line built to do two jobs at once: reassure and preempt. Ashcroft doesn’t argue policy on the merits; he claims legitimacy at the highest available register. “Path” suggests an ongoing journey, not a discrete decision - useful when the destination is controversial and the route is being contested in real time. “We” is the quiet power move: it folds executive officials, agencies, and by implication the public into a single marching unit. If you’re objecting, you’re not just disagreeing; you’re stepping outside the collective.
The word doing the heavy lifting is “constitutional.” It’s not descriptive so much as talismanic, a rhetorical shield that turns a political choice into an act of fidelity. In the early 2000s, with the post-9/11 security state expanding through surveillance, detention, and the Patriot Act, constitutional language became the battlefield. Ashcroft’s intent is to shift the terrain away from moral unease and civil-liberties anxiety and toward procedural authority: not “Is this wise?” but “Is this allowed?”
The subtext is more pointed: trust us, and stop asking. It’s a classic executive-branch posture in crisis, when urgency is treated as its own justification and legal interpretation becomes a substitute for democratic persuasion. The sentence works because it sounds calm, inevitable, and grown-up - a steadiness that, for supporters, reads as order, and for critics, reads as a warning that dissent will be framed as disloyalty to the Constitution itself.
The word doing the heavy lifting is “constitutional.” It’s not descriptive so much as talismanic, a rhetorical shield that turns a political choice into an act of fidelity. In the early 2000s, with the post-9/11 security state expanding through surveillance, detention, and the Patriot Act, constitutional language became the battlefield. Ashcroft’s intent is to shift the terrain away from moral unease and civil-liberties anxiety and toward procedural authority: not “Is this wise?” but “Is this allowed?”
The subtext is more pointed: trust us, and stop asking. It’s a classic executive-branch posture in crisis, when urgency is treated as its own justification and legal interpretation becomes a substitute for democratic persuasion. The sentence works because it sounds calm, inevitable, and grown-up - a steadiness that, for supporters, reads as order, and for critics, reads as a warning that dissent will be framed as disloyalty to the Constitution itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
