"The philosopher creates, he doesn't reflect"
About this Quote
Deleuze is picking a fight with the schoolbook image of philosophy as a mirror held up to reality. In “The philosopher creates, he doesn't reflect,” “reflect” is a loaded verb: it evokes contemplation-as-passivity, the philosopher as neutral observer polishing concepts that already exist. Deleuze flips that posture into something closer to engineering or art-making. Philosophy, for him, isn’t the afterimage of the world; it’s a workshop that fabricates the tools we use to think the world in the first place.
The intent is polemical and strategic. Deleuze wants to unseat the prestige of “recognition” (the comfortable feeling that an idea simply matches what we already believe) and replace it with invention. “Creates” signals concepts as productions, not discoveries: provisional, mobile, built to do work. That’s why his writing so often sounds like it’s trying to outrun common sense. He isn’t aiming for tidy representation; he’s building new handles for grasping forces like desire, power, difference, repetition.
The subtext is also a critique of philosophy’s self-mythology. Reflection flatters the thinker as disinterested and wise; creation implicates the thinker as a maker with stakes, style, and risk. It admits that concepts have consequences: they carve up experience, authorize institutions, legitimize norms.
Context matters: postwar French thought, disillusioned with grand “truth” narratives, and Deleuze’s broader project (especially in What Is Philosophy?) to define philosophy as the creation of concepts distinct from science (functions) and art (percepts/affects). It’s less a romantic slogan than a boundary line: philosophy earns its keep by inventing new possibilities of thought, not by describing the obvious in better prose.
The intent is polemical and strategic. Deleuze wants to unseat the prestige of “recognition” (the comfortable feeling that an idea simply matches what we already believe) and replace it with invention. “Creates” signals concepts as productions, not discoveries: provisional, mobile, built to do work. That’s why his writing so often sounds like it’s trying to outrun common sense. He isn’t aiming for tidy representation; he’s building new handles for grasping forces like desire, power, difference, repetition.
The subtext is also a critique of philosophy’s self-mythology. Reflection flatters the thinker as disinterested and wise; creation implicates the thinker as a maker with stakes, style, and risk. It admits that concepts have consequences: they carve up experience, authorize institutions, legitimize norms.
Context matters: postwar French thought, disillusioned with grand “truth” narratives, and Deleuze’s broader project (especially in What Is Philosophy?) to define philosophy as the creation of concepts distinct from science (functions) and art (percepts/affects). It’s less a romantic slogan than a boundary line: philosophy earns its keep by inventing new possibilities of thought, not by describing the obvious in better prose.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Gilles
Add to List
