"The point I am making is that in the more primitive forms of society the individual is merely a unit; in more developed forms of society he is an independent personality"
About this Quote
Read smuggles a whole political philosophy into a sentence that pretends to be anthropology. By calling early societies "primitive", he isn’t just describing technology levels; he’s marking a moral ladder. The "individual is merely a unit" is deliberately dehumanizing language, the kind you’d use for inventory or troop counts. Then comes the pivot: "independent personality" restores texture, interior life, unpredictability. The contrast is doing ideological work, turning social development into a story about emancipation.
The intent is less to map history than to justify a modernist, liberal (and in Read’s case, often anarchist-adjacent) valuation of the self. Read was a poet and art critic steeped in early 20th-century debates about the crowd, the mass state, and the machine age. After World War I and into the era of fascism and bureaucratic socialism, "unit" had an ominous resonance: the citizen reduced to a number, a body to be mobilized. His phrasing quietly recruits the reader to side with "personality" as a kind of cultural resistance.
The subtext is also a warning: development can be reversed. If society can treat people as units under certain conditions, modernity doesn’t automatically safeguard individuality; it has to be designed for it. As a poet, Read chooses "personality" instead of "rights" or "freedom" because he’s arguing for more than legal independence. He’s defending the imaginative self: the messy, nonstandard human being that art requires and that mass systems, left unchecked, tend to flatten.
The intent is less to map history than to justify a modernist, liberal (and in Read’s case, often anarchist-adjacent) valuation of the self. Read was a poet and art critic steeped in early 20th-century debates about the crowd, the mass state, and the machine age. After World War I and into the era of fascism and bureaucratic socialism, "unit" had an ominous resonance: the citizen reduced to a number, a body to be mobilized. His phrasing quietly recruits the reader to side with "personality" as a kind of cultural resistance.
The subtext is also a warning: development can be reversed. If society can treat people as units under certain conditions, modernity doesn’t automatically safeguard individuality; it has to be designed for it. As a poet, Read chooses "personality" instead of "rights" or "freedom" because he’s arguing for more than legal independence. He’s defending the imaginative self: the messy, nonstandard human being that art requires and that mass systems, left unchecked, tend to flatten.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Herbert
Add to List
