"The political core of any movement for freedom in the society has to have the political imperative to protect free speech"
About this Quote
hooks frames free speech less as a lofty ideal than as infrastructure: without it, any liberation project can be rerouted, surveilled, or quietly gutted. The phrase "political core" is doing heavy work. She is not talking about personal tolerance or campus etiquette; she is talking about power. Movements for freedom rise or fall on whether they can keep open the channels where dissent is articulated, strategy is debated, and leaders are held accountable. If speech narrows, freedom becomes branding.
Her insistence on a "political imperative" is a warning against sentimental activism. Protecting free speech is not a decorative value you tack on once you have achieved justice; it is a condition of pursuing justice without reproducing coercion. Subtext: movements are vulnerable to the same authoritarian temptations they oppose. When a cause begins policing language primarily to protect its own image or unity, it risks creating a miniature version of the domination it claims to dismantle.
Context matters here: hooks wrote inside late-20th-century feminist and anti-racist debates that wrestled with harm, representation, and who gets to speak. Her work persistently defended the necessity of critique within communities, especially for those already marginalized within them. "Any movement" reads like a deliberate broadside at purity politics from all sides: liberation cannot depend on silence, and solidarity cannot be built by gag order. She makes free speech sound less like a civil-liberties slogan than a survival tactic for democratic struggle.
Her insistence on a "political imperative" is a warning against sentimental activism. Protecting free speech is not a decorative value you tack on once you have achieved justice; it is a condition of pursuing justice without reproducing coercion. Subtext: movements are vulnerable to the same authoritarian temptations they oppose. When a cause begins policing language primarily to protect its own image or unity, it risks creating a miniature version of the domination it claims to dismantle.
Context matters here: hooks wrote inside late-20th-century feminist and anti-racist debates that wrestled with harm, representation, and who gets to speak. Her work persistently defended the necessity of critique within communities, especially for those already marginalized within them. "Any movement" reads like a deliberate broadside at purity politics from all sides: liberation cannot depend on silence, and solidarity cannot be built by gag order. She makes free speech sound less like a civil-liberties slogan than a survival tactic for democratic struggle.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Bell
Add to List





