"The problem is, is that President Bush and the Republican leadership in the Congress have resisted attempts to increase dramatically our fuel economy standards over the last five years"
About this Quote
Markey’s line is a small masterclass in legislative blame assignment: name the villain, define the clock, and frame the alternative as both obvious and overdue. The clunky opener ("The problem is, is that") isn’t elegant, but it functions like a verbal gavel. It signals impatience, not poetry, and sets up a prosecution brief: there’s been a clear solution on the table, and someone has been blocking it.
The specific intent is to make fuel economy standards feel less like a technical regulatory debate and more like a willful failure of governance. By pointing directly at "President Bush and the Republican leadership in the Congress", Markey collapses a complex policy ecosystem into a simple chain of responsibility. That’s the rhetorical move: if the public is angry about gas prices, oil dependence, or climate concerns, he’s offering a target and a narrative.
The subtext is that incrementalism has been a political choice, not an engineering limit. "Increase dramatically" is doing heavy lifting here: it implies that modest tweaks are performative, and that the necessary response has been repeatedly diluted. "Over the last five years" is a quiet indictment of squandered time - a reminder that this isn’t a sudden crisis but an ignored one.
Contextually, the Bush era was defined by post-9/11 energy security talk, volatile oil markets, and intensifying climate politics. Markey is leveraging that tension: if you believe national strength includes reducing oil dependence, then resisting stronger fuel standards starts to look less like prudence and more like capture, inertia, or ideological refusal to regulate.
The specific intent is to make fuel economy standards feel less like a technical regulatory debate and more like a willful failure of governance. By pointing directly at "President Bush and the Republican leadership in the Congress", Markey collapses a complex policy ecosystem into a simple chain of responsibility. That’s the rhetorical move: if the public is angry about gas prices, oil dependence, or climate concerns, he’s offering a target and a narrative.
The subtext is that incrementalism has been a political choice, not an engineering limit. "Increase dramatically" is doing heavy lifting here: it implies that modest tweaks are performative, and that the necessary response has been repeatedly diluted. "Over the last five years" is a quiet indictment of squandered time - a reminder that this isn’t a sudden crisis but an ignored one.
Contextually, the Bush era was defined by post-9/11 energy security talk, volatile oil markets, and intensifying climate politics. Markey is leveraging that tension: if you believe national strength includes reducing oil dependence, then resisting stronger fuel standards starts to look less like prudence and more like capture, inertia, or ideological refusal to regulate.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ed
Add to List


