"The public is a bad guesser"
About this Quote
A single jab, delivered with the calm confidence of someone who has watched crowds get it wrong for a living. De Quincey’s “The public is a bad guesser” isn’t just elitist throat-clearing; it’s an attack on the idea that popularity equals perception. “Guesser” is the tell. He’s not accusing the public of stupidity so much as of operating on shortcuts: hearsay, fashion, moral panic, the lazy satisfaction of a neat explanation. The public doesn’t examine; it estimates. It doesn’t read closely; it skims for a verdict.
In de Quincey’s era, that mattered. The early 19th century saw an expanding reading public, a booming periodical press, and the rise of criticism as mass entertainment - review culture as a kind of spectator sport. Reputations could be made, misshaped, or murdered by people encountering writers through snippets, summaries, and ideological filters. De Quincey himself lived in the ecosystem of magazines and essays; he benefited from the new audience while distrusting the crowd’s ability to judge anything that required patience, ambiguity, or technical taste.
The subtext is defensive but also strategic: don’t confuse noise for knowledge. He’s carving out a space for the slower authorities - the trained reader, the attentive critic, the artist’s own standards - against the tyranny of consensus. It’s a line that flatters the writer, yes, but its real bite is diagnostic: the public doesn’t “know” so much as it “bets,” and too often it wagers with other people’s money.
In de Quincey’s era, that mattered. The early 19th century saw an expanding reading public, a booming periodical press, and the rise of criticism as mass entertainment - review culture as a kind of spectator sport. Reputations could be made, misshaped, or murdered by people encountering writers through snippets, summaries, and ideological filters. De Quincey himself lived in the ecosystem of magazines and essays; he benefited from the new audience while distrusting the crowd’s ability to judge anything that required patience, ambiguity, or technical taste.
The subtext is defensive but also strategic: don’t confuse noise for knowledge. He’s carving out a space for the slower authorities - the trained reader, the attentive critic, the artist’s own standards - against the tyranny of consensus. It’s a line that flatters the writer, yes, but its real bite is diagnostic: the public doesn’t “know” so much as it “bets,” and too often it wagers with other people’s money.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List
