"The rapid dissemination of technology and information offers entirely new ways of production, but it can also bring the spectre of more states developing weapons of mass destruction"
About this Quote
Progress, in Lord Robertson's telling, comes with a shadow. The line is engineered to puncture the lazy optimism that often trails conversations about innovation: yes, faster networks and smarter tools can supercharge productivity, but they also erode the old gatekeepers that once kept catastrophic capabilities rare. The phrasing matters. "Rapid dissemination" makes the culprit not a villainous actor but the velocity of modern life itself. Technology and information are treated as twin agents, because in the contemporary security landscape, know-how travels nearly as fast as hardware.
Robertson's intent is diplomatic but unmistakably disciplinary: to argue for vigilance without sounding anti-modern. "Entirely new ways of production" nods toward globalization and dual-use manufacturing, where the same supply chains and techniques that build microchips or pharmaceuticals can be repurposed toward missile components or chemical precursors. The subtext is a warning about porous borders - not just physical borders, but jurisdictional ones. Innovation migrates into private firms, universities, and loosely regulated markets, leaving states to play catch-up.
"Spectre" is a rhetorically loaded choice, evoking a haunting rather than a headline. It implies a threat that is partially intangible: proliferation becomes more likely not only because malicious leaders exist, but because the barrier to entry keeps dropping. For a diplomat associated with NATO-era security debates, this is contextually tied to post-Cold War diffusion: as bipolar control faded, the problem stopped being one adversary's arsenal and became many actors, many pathways. It's a sentence designed to justify collective rules and surveillance as the price of an open, high-tech world.
Robertson's intent is diplomatic but unmistakably disciplinary: to argue for vigilance without sounding anti-modern. "Entirely new ways of production" nods toward globalization and dual-use manufacturing, where the same supply chains and techniques that build microchips or pharmaceuticals can be repurposed toward missile components or chemical precursors. The subtext is a warning about porous borders - not just physical borders, but jurisdictional ones. Innovation migrates into private firms, universities, and loosely regulated markets, leaving states to play catch-up.
"Spectre" is a rhetorically loaded choice, evoking a haunting rather than a headline. It implies a threat that is partially intangible: proliferation becomes more likely not only because malicious leaders exist, but because the barrier to entry keeps dropping. For a diplomat associated with NATO-era security debates, this is contextually tied to post-Cold War diffusion: as bipolar control faded, the problem stopped being one adversary's arsenal and became many actors, many pathways. It's a sentence designed to justify collective rules and surveillance as the price of an open, high-tech world.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Lord
Add to List
