"The real breeders of discontent and alien doctrines of government and philosophies subversive of good citizenship are such as these who take the law into their own hands"

The quote by John L. Lewis, a prominent American labor leader, touches on themes of law, governance, and social harmony. It recommends that people who bypass recognized legal systems and take matters into their own hands are the root cause of societal unrest and the spread of disruptive ideologies-- what Lewis refers to as "alien doctrines" and "approaches subversive of excellent citizenship."

When Lewis speak about "genuine breeders of discontent", he is highlighting that the actions of those who overlook the guideline of law result in a breakdown in social order. By preventing laws, they undermine the societal structures that are created to resolve complaints through established, tranquil ways. This lawlessness breeds dissatisfaction among the population since it produces an environment where there is unpredictability and unpredictability concerning justice and fairness.

The term "alien teachings of federal government" can be interpreted as ideologies that are foreign or contrary to the fundamental principles of the existing governmental structure. For Lewis, these doctrines likely consist of radical or revolutionary ideas that threaten democratic or constitutional governance. When individuals act outdoors legal structures, they accidentally endorse or influence these destabilizing ideologies by illustrating the insufficiency or inefficacy of the existing system.

Moreover, viewpoints that are "subversive of great citizenship" likely describe beliefs that deteriorate the obligations and tasks inherent to being a constructive member of society. Excellent citizenship includes adhering to laws and contributing favorably to community well-being. When people take the law into their own hands, they encourage a breakdown of communal trust and cooperative venture, essential parts of a functioning society.

In summary, John L. Lewis cautions against the risks of lawlessness, highlighting its prospective to incite discontent and promote ideologies that threaten social stability. His message is a require adherence to legal procedures as a method of protecting both governance and the social fabric.