"The real question is: How do you react? What do you do next? Evade responsibilities? Bury yourself in work? What do you do? All three of my novels take up that question, although none gives an answer"
About this Quote
Guterson frames crisis less as a plot device than as a character trap: the pressure point where personality stops being a set of beliefs and becomes a set of moves. The brisk volley of questions mimics the mental loop of someone trying to regain control after impact. You can feel the author’s novelist instinct at work here - not offering comfort, not offering a thesis, but staging the moment when self-image collides with consequence.
The genius is in the menu of “reactions,” because it’s not a heroic/weak binary. “Evade responsibilities” is the obvious moral failure, but “bury yourself in work” lands like a subtler indictment: a socially rewarded form of avoidance. Guterson implies that our coping strategies come pre-packaged in respectable disguises, and that modern life provides endless ways to look busy while staying emotionally absent. The question “What do you do next?” carries an ethical undertow: action is unavoidable, and even inaction is a choice that writes its own aftermath.
Saying his novels “take up that question” while “none gives an answer” reads like an artistic manifesto against tidy redemption arcs. It’s also a quiet rebuke to the reader’s hunger for closure. Guterson is signaling that the point of fiction, for him, isn’t to solve the human condition but to keep us in its unresolved room long enough to notice our own reflexes.
Contextually, this aligns with Guterson’s broader preoccupation with moral weather - guilt, obligation, and the way communities and private lives pressure people into self-justifying narratives. The “real question” isn’t what happened; it’s what you become when it does.
The genius is in the menu of “reactions,” because it’s not a heroic/weak binary. “Evade responsibilities” is the obvious moral failure, but “bury yourself in work” lands like a subtler indictment: a socially rewarded form of avoidance. Guterson implies that our coping strategies come pre-packaged in respectable disguises, and that modern life provides endless ways to look busy while staying emotionally absent. The question “What do you do next?” carries an ethical undertow: action is unavoidable, and even inaction is a choice that writes its own aftermath.
Saying his novels “take up that question” while “none gives an answer” reads like an artistic manifesto against tidy redemption arcs. It’s also a quiet rebuke to the reader’s hunger for closure. Guterson is signaling that the point of fiction, for him, isn’t to solve the human condition but to keep us in its unresolved room long enough to notice our own reflexes.
Contextually, this aligns with Guterson’s broader preoccupation with moral weather - guilt, obligation, and the way communities and private lives pressure people into self-justifying narratives. The “real question” isn’t what happened; it’s what you become when it does.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List
