"The reality is that we will be reading Miranda rights to the corpse of Osama bin Laden. He will never appear in an American courtroom. That's the reality. He will be killed by us, or he will be killed by his own people so he's not captured by us. We know that"
About this Quote
Holder’s line reads like a civics lecture delivered with a clenched jaw: it borrows the language of due process (Miranda rights) only to stage it as theater for the dead. The provocation is the point. By picturing agents dutifully reciting constitutional warnings to a corpse, he signals that the normal rituals of law are intact in spirit while conceding they’ll be bypassed in practice. It’s a rhetorical sleight of hand that tries to have it both ways: affirm the rulebook, then tell you the game won’t use it.
The context is the post-9/11 legal trench warfare over terrorism suspects, detention, and trial venues. In that climate, “American courtroom” isn’t just a building; it’s shorthand for vulnerability, spectacle, and political risk. Holder’s “reality” is a preemptive answer to critics demanding either a clean prosecution or a clean assassination. He’s narrowing the menu: no trial, no messy compromise, just an endpoint.
The subtext is also a message outward. To bin Laden and to allies, it frames capture as unlikely and fatal, tightening psychological pressure and justifying lethal force as inevitable rather than chosen. To the domestic audience, it offers a grim reassurance: the government can still speak the language of rights even when it expects to end the story with a kill operation. Repeating “reality” and ending with “We know that” isn’t evidence; it’s authority, a way to convert prediction into policy before anyone can argue about alternatives.
The context is the post-9/11 legal trench warfare over terrorism suspects, detention, and trial venues. In that climate, “American courtroom” isn’t just a building; it’s shorthand for vulnerability, spectacle, and political risk. Holder’s “reality” is a preemptive answer to critics demanding either a clean prosecution or a clean assassination. He’s narrowing the menu: no trial, no messy compromise, just an endpoint.
The subtext is also a message outward. To bin Laden and to allies, it frames capture as unlikely and fatal, tightening psychological pressure and justifying lethal force as inevitable rather than chosen. To the domestic audience, it offers a grim reassurance: the government can still speak the language of rights even when it expects to end the story with a kill operation. Repeating “reality” and ending with “We know that” isn’t evidence; it’s authority, a way to convert prediction into policy before anyone can argue about alternatives.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Eric
Add to List




