"The really big difference is that what you make with a molecular machine can be completely precise, down to the tiniest degree of detail that can exist in the world"
About this Quote
Precision is the sales pitch and the warning label rolled into one. When K. Eric Drexler talks about “molecular machines” producing things “completely precise, down to the tiniest degree of detail,” he’s not just marveling at smallness. He’s arguing that manufacturing could shift from the messy, tolerance-ridden world of macroscale engineering to an era where matter is arranged with the confidence of software: atom by atom, feature by feature, no improvisation required.
The intent is to reframe nanotechnology as a qualitative break, not a marginal upgrade. Traditional fabrication lives with error bars. Drexler’s phrasing tries to collapse those error bars toward the theoretical limit of physical reality. That “really big difference” is rhetorical triage: it separates molecular manufacturing from familiar miniaturization and claims a new category of capability, one that promises near-perfect repeatability and design fidelity.
Subtext: control. If you can specify structure at the smallest meaningful scale, you can specify function with unnerving accuracy. Materials become programmable; chemistry becomes engineering; scarcity begins to look like an artifact of crude tools rather than an iron law. That’s the utopian pull.
Context matters because Drexler is also the figure most associated with the cultural anxieties around nanotech: the leap from precision to proliferation, from making anything to making too much, too easily. The quote leans hard on “completely,” a word scientists usually treat like a live wire. It works because it courts that tension: awe at total mastery of matter, and the implicit question of what happens when mastery becomes routine.
The intent is to reframe nanotechnology as a qualitative break, not a marginal upgrade. Traditional fabrication lives with error bars. Drexler’s phrasing tries to collapse those error bars toward the theoretical limit of physical reality. That “really big difference” is rhetorical triage: it separates molecular manufacturing from familiar miniaturization and claims a new category of capability, one that promises near-perfect repeatability and design fidelity.
Subtext: control. If you can specify structure at the smallest meaningful scale, you can specify function with unnerving accuracy. Materials become programmable; chemistry becomes engineering; scarcity begins to look like an artifact of crude tools rather than an iron law. That’s the utopian pull.
Context matters because Drexler is also the figure most associated with the cultural anxieties around nanotech: the leap from precision to proliferation, from making anything to making too much, too easily. The quote leans hard on “completely,” a word scientists usually treat like a live wire. It works because it courts that tension: awe at total mastery of matter, and the implicit question of what happens when mastery becomes routine.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Eric Drexler
Add to List
