"The regulation of medicine has been a State function"
About this Quote
A deceptively bland sentence that doubles as a power play. When Barney Frank says, "The regulation of medicine has been a State function", he is not offering a civics lesson; he is planting a flag in the perennial American turf war: who gets to call the shots when health, money, and ideology collide.
The specific intent is to invoke precedent as argument. "Has been" is doing heavy lifting here, smuggling in the idea that tradition confers legitimacy and that changing jurisdiction would be a kind of political overreach. It is federalism as rhetorical shield: if you can frame the question as one of proper lanes rather than policy outcomes, you can slow down reform, redirect blame, or force compromise without ever arguing the merits of the regulation itself.
The subtext is sharper. States' rights talk often arrives wearing neutral technocratic clothing, but it carries real distributional stakes. State-based regulation can mean variability: different standards, different enforcement, different access. That patchwork can protect local autonomy, but it can also protect local industries, local moral codes, and local gatekeepers. Frank, a hard-nosed legislative tactician, likely understands that "State function" is also a way to talk about power without admitting you're talking about power.
Context matters because medicine sits at the intersection of licensing, insurance markets, malpractice law, public health authority, and culture-war flashpoints. In Congress, a sentence like this often appears when someone wants to resist national standardization or challenge federal preemption. It is a reminder that in American politics, the fight is rarely just about medicine; it's about who gets to define it.
The specific intent is to invoke precedent as argument. "Has been" is doing heavy lifting here, smuggling in the idea that tradition confers legitimacy and that changing jurisdiction would be a kind of political overreach. It is federalism as rhetorical shield: if you can frame the question as one of proper lanes rather than policy outcomes, you can slow down reform, redirect blame, or force compromise without ever arguing the merits of the regulation itself.
The subtext is sharper. States' rights talk often arrives wearing neutral technocratic clothing, but it carries real distributional stakes. State-based regulation can mean variability: different standards, different enforcement, different access. That patchwork can protect local autonomy, but it can also protect local industries, local moral codes, and local gatekeepers. Frank, a hard-nosed legislative tactician, likely understands that "State function" is also a way to talk about power without admitting you're talking about power.
Context matters because medicine sits at the intersection of licensing, insurance markets, malpractice law, public health authority, and culture-war flashpoints. In Congress, a sentence like this often appears when someone wants to resist national standardization or challenge federal preemption. It is a reminder that in American politics, the fight is rarely just about medicine; it's about who gets to define it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Barney
Add to List






