"The reports of the eclipse parties not only described the scientific observations in great detail, but also the travels and experiences, and were sometimes marked by a piquancy not common in official documents"
About this Quote
Even in the age of brass instruments and sober institutions, science was never purely sober. Newcomb is letting the mask slip: the “eclipse parties” (a wonderfully social phrase for what could be framed as austere fieldwork) produced accounts that did double duty. They were technical documents, yes, but also travel writing, diary, and status signal. The line quietly admits that the infrastructure of knowledge is built on human appetites: curiosity, adventure, competitiveness, even the pleasure of telling a good story.
The word choice does the heavy lifting. “Official documents” evokes the Victorian ideal of impersonal authority, where facts arrive scrubbed of personality. Against that, “piquancy” suggests spice, flirtation, maybe a hint of scandal - not enough to discredit the work, but enough to make it readable. Newcomb isn’t condemning this; he’s amused by it, and maybe relieved. He recognizes that the public-facing voice of science often pretends to be above narrative, when narrative is exactly how institutions recruit attention and legitimacy.
Context matters: late-19th-century eclipse expeditions were expensive, logistically heroic, and culturally glamorous - scientists traveling like imperial envoys, dragging delicate instruments across oceans to catch a few minutes of darkness. Reports that included “travels and experiences” weren’t accidental; they justified funding, dramatized expertise, and converted a fleeting celestial event into a durable story. Newcomb’s aside is a reminder that objectivity has a prose style, and that style is negotiated - sometimes, thankfully, with a little bite.
The word choice does the heavy lifting. “Official documents” evokes the Victorian ideal of impersonal authority, where facts arrive scrubbed of personality. Against that, “piquancy” suggests spice, flirtation, maybe a hint of scandal - not enough to discredit the work, but enough to make it readable. Newcomb isn’t condemning this; he’s amused by it, and maybe relieved. He recognizes that the public-facing voice of science often pretends to be above narrative, when narrative is exactly how institutions recruit attention and legitimacy.
Context matters: late-19th-century eclipse expeditions were expensive, logistically heroic, and culturally glamorous - scientists traveling like imperial envoys, dragging delicate instruments across oceans to catch a few minutes of darkness. Reports that included “travels and experiences” weren’t accidental; they justified funding, dramatized expertise, and converted a fleeting celestial event into a durable story. Newcomb’s aside is a reminder that objectivity has a prose style, and that style is negotiated - sometimes, thankfully, with a little bite.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Simon
Add to List
