"The rich pay more in total taxes now than ever before - ever. It's true. Just like it's true that when the rich are convinced they're going to be taxed more, they spend less. And when the top few percenters don't spend, there goes all your spending, because they account for half of all retail spending"
About this Quote
Cavuto’s line is built like a cable-news syllogism: start with a factoid that sounds unassailable ("more in total taxes than ever"), pivot to a behavioral warning ("they spend less"), then land on a hostage note to policymakers ("there goes all your spending"). The intent is less to map the tax system than to police the boundaries of acceptable tax talk. It’s a preemptive argument against raising rates, framed as pragmatic economics rather than ideological preference.
The subtext is doing the heavy lifting. "In total taxes" is a tell: it swaps out the politically charged question of tax burden (share of income, effective rates, progressivity) for a raw-dollar number that will almost always rise as the economy and wealth at the top expand. It’s a rhetorical hack that sounds like fairness while dodging distribution. The phrase "convinced they're going to be taxed more" is also revealing: not actual policy, but expectation. That’s the emotional lever - anxiety as an economic force - and it conveniently makes even debating higher taxes a kind of sabotage.
Then comes the biggest move: recasting the rich as the consumer engine of America. "Half of all retail spending" doesn’t just describe a spending pattern; it implies dependence, even entitlement. If prosperity hinges on top-end shoppers continuing to feel cherished, public policy becomes customer service for the wealthy.
Context matters: this is the post-Reagan, post-2008 media economy where economic arguments are narrated as market psychology and tax politics are filtered through investment confidence. Cavuto packages class power as macroeconomic common sense, turning redistribution into a threat and consumption into the nation’s fragile oxygen supply.
The subtext is doing the heavy lifting. "In total taxes" is a tell: it swaps out the politically charged question of tax burden (share of income, effective rates, progressivity) for a raw-dollar number that will almost always rise as the economy and wealth at the top expand. It’s a rhetorical hack that sounds like fairness while dodging distribution. The phrase "convinced they're going to be taxed more" is also revealing: not actual policy, but expectation. That’s the emotional lever - anxiety as an economic force - and it conveniently makes even debating higher taxes a kind of sabotage.
Then comes the biggest move: recasting the rich as the consumer engine of America. "Half of all retail spending" doesn’t just describe a spending pattern; it implies dependence, even entitlement. If prosperity hinges on top-end shoppers continuing to feel cherished, public policy becomes customer service for the wealthy.
Context matters: this is the post-Reagan, post-2008 media economy where economic arguments are narrated as market psychology and tax politics are filtered through investment confidence. Cavuto packages class power as macroeconomic common sense, turning redistribution into a threat and consumption into the nation’s fragile oxygen supply.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wealth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Neil
Add to List






