"The roster of Nobel Peace Prize winners, though it has some strange people on it from time to time, tends to feature folks who fought for social justice in a nonviolent and constructive way somehow"
About this Quote
The line lands like a polite shrug that’s secretly a knife. Burgess, a man whose own legacy is tied to betrayal and clandestine power, frames the Nobel Peace Prize as mostly respectable while leaving a trapdoor open: “some strange people.” That mild phrasing does heavy work. It’s not outrage; it’s a knowing smirk, the kind that suggests the institution’s reputation survives not because it’s pure, but because it’s curated.
The intent is twofold. On the surface, it’s a commonsense description of the Prize’s brand: nonviolence, “constructive” reform, social justice that can be narrated as progress. Underneath, Burgess is pointing at the Prize’s gatekeeping. “Nonviolent and constructive” isn’t just moral praise; it’s a filter that favors certain types of dissent - the kind legible to Western liberal institutions, the kind that can be honored without destabilizing the people doing the honoring. Radicalism gets sanded down into civics.
Context matters because Burgess isn’t an idealistic outsider; he’s a criminal with intimate knowledge of how “peace” can be a slogan used by states and elites. That makes the line feel less like admiration and more like institutional anthropology: the Nobel committee, like any prestige machine, tells a story about what change should look like. The “strange people” clause is the escape hatch for hypocrisy, the preemptive acknowledgment that even a prize for peace can’t fully control who ends up useful to its narrative.
The intent is twofold. On the surface, it’s a commonsense description of the Prize’s brand: nonviolence, “constructive” reform, social justice that can be narrated as progress. Underneath, Burgess is pointing at the Prize’s gatekeeping. “Nonviolent and constructive” isn’t just moral praise; it’s a filter that favors certain types of dissent - the kind legible to Western liberal institutions, the kind that can be honored without destabilizing the people doing the honoring. Radicalism gets sanded down into civics.
Context matters because Burgess isn’t an idealistic outsider; he’s a criminal with intimate knowledge of how “peace” can be a slogan used by states and elites. That makes the line feel less like admiration and more like institutional anthropology: the Nobel committee, like any prestige machine, tells a story about what change should look like. The “strange people” clause is the escape hatch for hypocrisy, the preemptive acknowledgment that even a prize for peace can’t fully control who ends up useful to its narrative.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Guy
Add to List






