"The same ambition can destroy or save, and make a patriot as it makes a knave"
About this Quote
Ambition is an engine of human action that takes its moral color from the uses to which it is put. Alexander Pope, the Augustan master of the balanced couplet, compresses a whole moral philosophy into the antithesis between patriot and knave. The same inner drive can ruin or redeem, depending on what governs it: ends, means, and the objects of desire. Ambition itself is not condemned; it is morally ambiguous energy. It becomes destructive when tethered to vanity, greed, or domination, and saving when directed toward duty, honor, and the common good.
Pope wrote amid early 18th-century debates about self-interest and virtue, in which writers like Bernard Mandeville suggested that private vices could yield public benefits. Pope answers more temperately: human passions are facts of nature, but moral character lies in how reason, conscience, and social institutions shape them. His moral essays explore the idea of a ruling passion, suggesting that people are moved by deep, recurring motives; the task of virtue is not to extinguish these fires but to channel them. Hence ambition may propel a reformer who risks comfort for justice, or a demagogue who cloaks appetite in patriotic rhetoric.
The compact symmetry of the couplet enacts the argument. The chiasmic play of destroy/save and patriot/knave reflects how thin the line can be between public virtue and private corruption. Time, circumstance, and incentives press on the same motive and tilt it toward noble sacrifice or cunning self-advancement. Politics, Pope hints, is crowded with both figures, often indistinguishable until tests of principle arrive.
The warning is practical as well as philosophical. Honor codes, laws, education, and examples of genuine service can domesticate ambition, giving it worthy aims; flattery, faction, and impunity let it curdle. To assess leaders and ourselves, do not ask whether ambition burns, but what it burns for, and who it burns up.
Pope wrote amid early 18th-century debates about self-interest and virtue, in which writers like Bernard Mandeville suggested that private vices could yield public benefits. Pope answers more temperately: human passions are facts of nature, but moral character lies in how reason, conscience, and social institutions shape them. His moral essays explore the idea of a ruling passion, suggesting that people are moved by deep, recurring motives; the task of virtue is not to extinguish these fires but to channel them. Hence ambition may propel a reformer who risks comfort for justice, or a demagogue who cloaks appetite in patriotic rhetoric.
The compact symmetry of the couplet enacts the argument. The chiasmic play of destroy/save and patriot/knave reflects how thin the line can be between public virtue and private corruption. Time, circumstance, and incentives press on the same motive and tilt it toward noble sacrifice or cunning self-advancement. Politics, Pope hints, is crowded with both figures, often indistinguishable until tests of principle arrive.
The warning is practical as well as philosophical. Honor codes, laws, education, and examples of genuine service can domesticate ambition, giving it worthy aims; flattery, faction, and impunity let it curdle. To assess leaders and ourselves, do not ask whether ambition burns, but what it burns for, and who it burns up.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Alexander
Add to List
