"The same European governments that hesitated to confront terrorists were more than prepared to oppose us"
About this Quote
Perle’s line is a provocation disguised as a diagnosis: it frames Europe’s caution as moral weakness, then spotlights its willingness to resist American power as proof of misaligned priorities. The sentence is engineered to sting. “Hesitated” isn’t just a description; it’s an accusation of cowardice and bureaucratic paralysis. “More than prepared” flips the knife, implying that Europe can act decisively when the target is Washington, not terrorists. The message is less about security policy than about loyalty.
The context matters. Perle, a prominent neoconservative voice in the post-9/11 era, is speaking into a transatlantic relationship strained by the Iraq War and by competing ideas of legitimacy: Europe’s preference for multilateral process versus the Bush administration’s readiness to act preemptively. By collapsing European counterterrorism debates into “hesitation,” Perle sidesteps the inconvenient details: legal constraints, intelligence failures, domestic politics, and the memory of past American interventions. The quote works rhetorically because it simplifies a complex disagreement into a character test.
The subtext is transactional: if Europe won’t line up behind U.S. strategy, it must be indulging or appeasing the enemy. That binary is the point. It converts policy dissent into ethical failure, and it rallies an American audience by casting skepticism from allies as betrayal. The cleverness is its asymmetry: terrorism is painted as an external threat requiring unity, while opposition to “us” becomes the real scandal, making European independence itself sound suspect.
The context matters. Perle, a prominent neoconservative voice in the post-9/11 era, is speaking into a transatlantic relationship strained by the Iraq War and by competing ideas of legitimacy: Europe’s preference for multilateral process versus the Bush administration’s readiness to act preemptively. By collapsing European counterterrorism debates into “hesitation,” Perle sidesteps the inconvenient details: legal constraints, intelligence failures, domestic politics, and the memory of past American interventions. The quote works rhetorically because it simplifies a complex disagreement into a character test.
The subtext is transactional: if Europe won’t line up behind U.S. strategy, it must be indulging or appeasing the enemy. That binary is the point. It converts policy dissent into ethical failure, and it rallies an American audience by casting skepticism from allies as betrayal. The cleverness is its asymmetry: terrorism is painted as an external threat requiring unity, while opposition to “us” becomes the real scandal, making European independence itself sound suspect.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List



