"The same sort of thing happened in my dispute with the National Trust book: Follies: A National Trust Guide, which implied that the only pleasure you can get from Folly architecture is by calling the architect mad, and by laughing at the architecture"
About this Quote
Finlay is doing what he does best: turning a seemingly fussy aesthetic argument into a moral skirmish over who gets to decide what counts as “serious.” His target isn’t just a National Trust guidebook; it’s a whole institutional reflex that protects taste by shrinking anything unruly into a joke. If follies can only be enjoyed by calling their makers “mad,” then the public gets permission to consume extravagance without letting it challenge the rules of utility, restraint, and “good design.”
The sentence is structured like a courtroom brief, but it bites like satire. “The same sort of thing” suggests a pattern: the dispute is not isolated but symptomatic. The phrase “implied that the only pleasure you can get” is crucial: he’s accusing the book of policing pleasure itself, narrowing the emotional and intellectual range available to visitors. Laughter, in this framing, becomes a disciplinary tool. You laugh at the folly to avoid being implicated by it, to keep its excess at a safe, patronizing distance.
Finlay’s subtext is also self-defensive in an interesting way. He spent his career mixing poetry, inscription, and landscape into works that institutions often treated as decorative, eccentric, or provocatively “difficult.” Follies, like his garden temples and carved texts, sit in the overlap between art and architecture, play and seriousness. By rejecting the “mad architect” trope, he insists that whimsy isn’t a defect to be forgiven by mockery; it’s an intentional mode with its own intelligence.
Context matters: heritage bodies sell culture to the public through digestible narratives. Finlay is pointing out the cost of that digestibility: when gatekeepers flatten complexity into a laugh line, they aren’t just misreading buildings. They’re training us to distrust any pleasure that can’t be justified in respectable terms.
The sentence is structured like a courtroom brief, but it bites like satire. “The same sort of thing” suggests a pattern: the dispute is not isolated but symptomatic. The phrase “implied that the only pleasure you can get” is crucial: he’s accusing the book of policing pleasure itself, narrowing the emotional and intellectual range available to visitors. Laughter, in this framing, becomes a disciplinary tool. You laugh at the folly to avoid being implicated by it, to keep its excess at a safe, patronizing distance.
Finlay’s subtext is also self-defensive in an interesting way. He spent his career mixing poetry, inscription, and landscape into works that institutions often treated as decorative, eccentric, or provocatively “difficult.” Follies, like his garden temples and carved texts, sit in the overlap between art and architecture, play and seriousness. By rejecting the “mad architect” trope, he insists that whimsy isn’t a defect to be forgiven by mockery; it’s an intentional mode with its own intelligence.
Context matters: heritage bodies sell culture to the public through digestible narratives. Finlay is pointing out the cost of that digestibility: when gatekeepers flatten complexity into a laugh line, they aren’t just misreading buildings. They’re training us to distrust any pleasure that can’t be justified in respectable terms.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ian
Add to List








