"The single currency should allow the European Union, and therefore France, to balance its monetary strength with the United States. It should help us adjust to the development of China"
About this Quote
A single currency is sold here as a lever of power, not a technocratic convenience. Fabius frames the euro less as a peace project or a market tidy-up than as an instrument to rebalance the global hierarchy: monetary strength as geopolitical muscle. The syntax gives the game away. “The European Union, and therefore France” smuggles a national ambition inside a supranational wrapper, implying that French influence is best expressed indirectly, through Europe’s scale. It’s a classic Fifth Republic reflex: sovereignty reimagined as the ability to shape rules larger than oneself.
The context is the post-Cold War moment when America’s “exorbitant privilege” (the dollar’s dominance) looked like a permanent feature of globalization, and Europe’s answer was supposed to be integration with teeth. Fabius is also making an argument to domestic skeptics: the euro is not surrender, it’s leverage. That’s why “balance” is the operative verb, suggesting a counterweight rather than confrontation - Europe as a stabilizer in a unipolar financial system.
Then comes China, introduced not as a partner or threat but as “development,” a polite euphemism for the gravitational shift of manufacturing, trade, and reserves. “Adjust” signals anxiety without saying so: the euro as shock absorber against an economy that will pull wages, supply chains, and strategic attention eastward.
Subtext: France can’t outspend Washington or outcompete Beijing alone, but it can help design a currency area that forces both to take Europe seriously. The promise is agency through aggregation - and the quiet admission that national power now depends on shared architecture.
The context is the post-Cold War moment when America’s “exorbitant privilege” (the dollar’s dominance) looked like a permanent feature of globalization, and Europe’s answer was supposed to be integration with teeth. Fabius is also making an argument to domestic skeptics: the euro is not surrender, it’s leverage. That’s why “balance” is the operative verb, suggesting a counterweight rather than confrontation - Europe as a stabilizer in a unipolar financial system.
Then comes China, introduced not as a partner or threat but as “development,” a polite euphemism for the gravitational shift of manufacturing, trade, and reserves. “Adjust” signals anxiety without saying so: the euro as shock absorber against an economy that will pull wages, supply chains, and strategic attention eastward.
Subtext: France can’t outspend Washington or outcompete Beijing alone, but it can help design a currency area that forces both to take Europe seriously. The promise is agency through aggregation - and the quiet admission that national power now depends on shared architecture.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Laurent
Add to List
