"The Soviet Union was an exception, but even there chess players were not rich. Only Fischer changed that"
About this Quote
The second sentence is the real needle: “Only Fischer changed that.” Spassky isn’t merely praising Bobby Fischer’s genius; he’s crediting him with turning chess skill into market power. Fischer didn’t just beat the Soviet machine in 1972 - he made the game legible to capitalism. He proved a chess player could be an event, a brand, a bargaining position. Prize funds rose, sponsorships became plausible, and organizers learned that drama sells: the lone American antihero versus the empire, personality versus bureaucracy.
There’s also a private subtext. Spassky lost to Fischer, but he’s framing Fischer’s impact as structural, almost inevitable, which softens the personal sting. It’s a rival’s compliment that doubles as a critique of both systems: Soviet prestige without profit, Western profit built on spectacle.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wealth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Spassky, Boris. (2026, January 17). The Soviet Union was an exception, but even there chess players were not rich. Only Fischer changed that. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-soviet-union-was-an-exception-but-even-there-38586/
Chicago Style
Spassky, Boris. "The Soviet Union was an exception, but even there chess players were not rich. Only Fischer changed that." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-soviet-union-was-an-exception-but-even-there-38586/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"The Soviet Union was an exception, but even there chess players were not rich. Only Fischer changed that." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-soviet-union-was-an-exception-but-even-there-38586/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.



