"The soy-bean, in particular, has proved sufficiently resistant to cold in spring and to adverse weather during summer to warrant heavy planting, especially throughout the South"
About this Quote
A sentence like this reads blandly agronomic until you clock who’s talking: David F. Houston, a cabinet-level architect of early 20th-century American farm policy. The diction is technocratic on purpose. “Proved,” “sufficiently resistant,” “to warrant” all perform the voice of neutral expertise, as if the market and the soil have independently delivered the verdict. That’s the rhetorical trick: policy disguised as inevitability.
The specific intent is practical and directive. Houston isn’t praising soybeans for their own sake; he’s nudging a planting decision at scale, using climate resilience as the selling point. “Cold in spring” and “adverse weather during summer” aren’t just weather notes; they are risk categories. He’s translating uncertainty into manageable planning, a pitch to farmers and regional boosters that this crop can survive the South’s volatility and still turn a profit.
The subtext is national strategy. “Heavy planting” implies more than individual choice; it implies coordinated adoption, the kind that makes supply chains, processing capacity, and export possibilities viable. In Houston’s era, American agriculture was being rationalized through institutions: extension services, federal reports, and a growing belief that the state could modernize the countryside by steering what got grown and where. Calling out “especially throughout the South” carries its own charge: crop diversification as a quiet corrective to a region long trapped by monoculture and price dependency, with soy positioned as the hardy, modern alternative that can weather both climate and market shocks.
The specific intent is practical and directive. Houston isn’t praising soybeans for their own sake; he’s nudging a planting decision at scale, using climate resilience as the selling point. “Cold in spring” and “adverse weather during summer” aren’t just weather notes; they are risk categories. He’s translating uncertainty into manageable planning, a pitch to farmers and regional boosters that this crop can survive the South’s volatility and still turn a profit.
The subtext is national strategy. “Heavy planting” implies more than individual choice; it implies coordinated adoption, the kind that makes supply chains, processing capacity, and export possibilities viable. In Houston’s era, American agriculture was being rationalized through institutions: extension services, federal reports, and a growing belief that the state could modernize the countryside by steering what got grown and where. Calling out “especially throughout the South” carries its own charge: crop diversification as a quiet corrective to a region long trapped by monoculture and price dependency, with soy positioned as the hardy, modern alternative that can weather both climate and market shocks.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by David
Add to List





