"The state is out of control, the state is on a spending binge, the state has to stop putting itself in a hole that's getting deeper and deeper and deeper"
About this Quote
Alarmism, delivered with boardroom cadence: Ueberroth’s line is engineered to make public finance sound like an addict and a collapsing mine shaft at the same time. “Out of control” sets the emotional temperature first; it’s not a budget dispute, it’s a crisis of governance. Then comes the moral framing: “spending binge” isn’t neutral accounting language, it’s a character judgment. The state isn’t making choices under constraint; it’s indulging, recklessly, like someone who can’t stop themselves.
The repetition - “deeper and deeper and deeper” - is the rhetorical equivalent of a downward spiral graphic on cable news. It’s not there to clarify magnitude; it’s there to build inevitability, to suggest that if the state isn’t stopped now, physics takes over. That “has to stop” is crucial, too: it positions austerity not as a political preference but as an emergency brake.
Contextually, this is a businessman’s translation of civic complexity into a familiar corporate cautionary tale: overspending leads to insolvency, full stop. The subtext is that government should be judged like a firm, with discipline, limits, and consequences - and that the private sector’s pragmatism is the antidote to bureaucratic appetite. It also quietly dodges the harder questions: What counts as “spending”? Who benefits? Is the hole caused by outlays, revenue choices, economic downturns, or all three?
The genius of the quote is its simplicity; the risk is that simplicity becomes a weapon, turning democratic tradeoffs into a one-note story of irresponsibility.
The repetition - “deeper and deeper and deeper” - is the rhetorical equivalent of a downward spiral graphic on cable news. It’s not there to clarify magnitude; it’s there to build inevitability, to suggest that if the state isn’t stopped now, physics takes over. That “has to stop” is crucial, too: it positions austerity not as a political preference but as an emergency brake.
Contextually, this is a businessman’s translation of civic complexity into a familiar corporate cautionary tale: overspending leads to insolvency, full stop. The subtext is that government should be judged like a firm, with discipline, limits, and consequences - and that the private sector’s pragmatism is the antidote to bureaucratic appetite. It also quietly dodges the harder questions: What counts as “spending”? Who benefits? Is the hole caused by outlays, revenue choices, economic downturns, or all three?
The genius of the quote is its simplicity; the risk is that simplicity becomes a weapon, turning democratic tradeoffs into a one-note story of irresponsibility.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List

