"The state of Israel must, from time to time, prove clearly that it is strong, and able and willing to use force, in a devastating and highly effective way. If it does not prove this, it will be swallowed up, and perhaps wiped off the face of the earth"
About this Quote
Strength, in Sharett's formulation, isn't a virtue; it's a recurring performance staged for survival. The line is built on a brutal premise: a small state in a hostile neighborhood can't afford ambiguity. "From time to time" matters as much as "devastating". Deterrence here is not a steady posture but a periodic demonstration, a reminder shot across the region's collective memory. The sentence reads like strategic doctrine stripped of euphemism: peace is purchased not by reassurance but by fear.
The subtext is a psychology of vulnerability that hardens into policy. "Swallowed up" and "wiped off the face of the earth" aren't just metaphors; they're a rhetorical funnel that compresses the entire political spectrum into a single, existential choice. Once you accept that annihilation is always on the table, restraint becomes legible as naivete, and escalation becomes not only permissible but morally urgent. Sharett's use of "prove clearly" suggests that intent isn't enough; adversaries must be convinced, and civilians at home must be steadied by a visible capacity to punish.
Context sharpens the edge. Sharett was a founding-era Israeli statesman navigating the early years of statehood and the aftermath of the 1948 war, when borders were contested, infiltration and reprisals were frequent, and international legitimacy felt fragile. The quote captures an early, formative logic of deterrence: legitimacy abroad and cohesion at home are secured through demonstrations of force. It's consequential rhetoric because it doesn't merely justify violence; it makes it cyclical, scheduled, and politically necessary - a doctrine that can outlive the moment that birthed it.
The subtext is a psychology of vulnerability that hardens into policy. "Swallowed up" and "wiped off the face of the earth" aren't just metaphors; they're a rhetorical funnel that compresses the entire political spectrum into a single, existential choice. Once you accept that annihilation is always on the table, restraint becomes legible as naivete, and escalation becomes not only permissible but morally urgent. Sharett's use of "prove clearly" suggests that intent isn't enough; adversaries must be convinced, and civilians at home must be steadied by a visible capacity to punish.
Context sharpens the edge. Sharett was a founding-era Israeli statesman navigating the early years of statehood and the aftermath of the 1948 war, when borders were contested, infiltration and reprisals were frequent, and international legitimacy felt fragile. The quote captures an early, formative logic of deterrence: legitimacy abroad and cohesion at home are secured through demonstrations of force. It's consequential rhetoric because it doesn't merely justify violence; it makes it cyclical, scheduled, and politically necessary - a doctrine that can outlive the moment that birthed it.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Moshe
Add to List



