"The Tax Code today is more complicated than ever, and the very people on the Republican side who denounce the Tax Code's complexity are the ones that put together what they now call a convoluted monstrosity. They put it into effect"
About this Quote
Neal’s line isn’t built to enlighten; it’s built to indict. He frames the tax code less as a policy problem than as a credibility test, turning “complexity” into evidence of political bad faith. The real move is in the sequencing: Republicans “denounce” the mess, then he snaps the timeline back to authorship - “the ones that put together” - and lands the punch with the prosecutorial finality of “They put it into effect.” It’s not argument-by-spreadsheet; it’s argument-by-fingerprint.
The intent is tactical. In tax debates, “simplification” is a bipartisan shibboleth that sounds like reform while often masking distributional choices. Neal drags that euphemism into the open. By calling the code a “convoluted monstrosity,” he borrows the opposition’s moral language, then flips it into a boomerang: if you hate the monster, why did you build it? The subtext is that complexity isn’t an accident of modern life but a feature designed to carve out favors, obscure winners and losers, and make accountability harder once the bill is law.
Context matters: post-2017 tax fights were saturated with claims that sweeping GOP changes would streamline filing. Neal, as a senior House tax figure, is positioning Democrats as the party of competence and Republicans as arsonists posing as firefighters. The rhetoric is blunt because the target isn’t just policy; it’s the narrative advantage of being “anti-bureaucracy” while governing through it.
The intent is tactical. In tax debates, “simplification” is a bipartisan shibboleth that sounds like reform while often masking distributional choices. Neal drags that euphemism into the open. By calling the code a “convoluted monstrosity,” he borrows the opposition’s moral language, then flips it into a boomerang: if you hate the monster, why did you build it? The subtext is that complexity isn’t an accident of modern life but a feature designed to carve out favors, obscure winners and losers, and make accountability harder once the bill is law.
Context matters: post-2017 tax fights were saturated with claims that sweeping GOP changes would streamline filing. Neal, as a senior House tax figure, is positioning Democrats as the party of competence and Republicans as arsonists posing as firefighters. The rhetoric is blunt because the target isn’t just policy; it’s the narrative advantage of being “anti-bureaucracy” while governing through it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List
