"The tension between "yes" and "no," between "I can" and "I cannot," makes us feel that, in so many instances, human life is an interminable debate with one's self"
About this Quote
Broyard pins a whole theory of consciousness to four blunt syllables: yes, no, can, cannot. It’s a critic’s move - reduce the sprawling mess of “human life” to a small, repeatable argument and let the repetition do the work. The line is less a lament than a diagnosis: what exhausts us isn’t just external pressure but the ceaseless internal cross-examination, the way every desire arrives with its own rebuttal already attached.
The phrasing matters. “Tension” suggests not a tidy choice but a stretched muscle, a held breath. “Interminable debate” makes the self sound like a committee that never adjourns, always drafting amendments to its own impulses. Broyard’s subtext is that modern life trains us to experience agency as litigation: we prosecute and defend ourselves, collecting evidence (“I can”) and counter-evidence (“I cannot”) until action feels almost secondary.
As a cultural critic who wrote with the intimacy of a memoirist, Broyard is also quietly advertising a method. Critics live in the hinge between affirmation and refusal: liking and dismissing, granting and withholding legitimacy. He projects that professional posture inward, implying that taste, ambition, illness, love - all of it - becomes a critical exercise. The “interminable” part isn’t merely psychological; it’s historical. In an era that sells self-realization while multiplying constraints (money, status, identity, mortality), the self becomes the arena where competing scripts argue for control. Broyard makes that argument feel true because he refuses uplift. No pep talk, just the honest static of being human.
The phrasing matters. “Tension” suggests not a tidy choice but a stretched muscle, a held breath. “Interminable debate” makes the self sound like a committee that never adjourns, always drafting amendments to its own impulses. Broyard’s subtext is that modern life trains us to experience agency as litigation: we prosecute and defend ourselves, collecting evidence (“I can”) and counter-evidence (“I cannot”) until action feels almost secondary.
As a cultural critic who wrote with the intimacy of a memoirist, Broyard is also quietly advertising a method. Critics live in the hinge between affirmation and refusal: liking and dismissing, granting and withholding legitimacy. He projects that professional posture inward, implying that taste, ambition, illness, love - all of it - becomes a critical exercise. The “interminable” part isn’t merely psychological; it’s historical. In an era that sells self-realization while multiplying constraints (money, status, identity, mortality), the self becomes the arena where competing scripts argue for control. Broyard makes that argument feel true because he refuses uplift. No pep talk, just the honest static of being human.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Anatole
Add to List








