"The terrorists that we are up against today do not rely upon cell phones and SAT phones and emails. They rely on couriers. You cannot intercept what a courier is telling somebody"
About this Quote
North’s line is a kind of tactical throat-clearing that doubles as political judo: if the enemy is analog, then the state’s most controversial digital dragnet starts to look less like overreach and more like busywork. By insisting terrorists “rely on couriers,” he flips the usual post-9/11 promise of omniscience on its head. The subtext is blunt: don’t expect clean, cinematic victories from surveillance; the world is messier, older, and harder to wiretap than the budgets and slogans suggest.
It works because it appeals to a soldier’s authority while quietly lowering the bar for accountability. “You cannot intercept what a courier is telling somebody” isn’t just a technical point; it’s an argument about limits. If interception is impossible, then failures to prevent attacks can be framed as inevitabilities rather than policy choices. That framing also nudges audiences toward more intrusive alternatives: if signals intelligence can’t do it, maybe you need more human intelligence, more informants, more pressure on communities, more latitude to detain and question.
The context matters. North, a veteran of Cold War-era operations and a central figure in Iran-Contra, speaks from a worldview where covert networks and deniable logistics are the norm. His credibility trades on combat pragmatism, but his history also shadows the statement: “couriers” evoke a politics of secrecy in which information moves off-grid precisely to evade oversight. The line is less a warning about terrorists than a reminder that power, too, prefers messages that can’t be intercepted.
It works because it appeals to a soldier’s authority while quietly lowering the bar for accountability. “You cannot intercept what a courier is telling somebody” isn’t just a technical point; it’s an argument about limits. If interception is impossible, then failures to prevent attacks can be framed as inevitabilities rather than policy choices. That framing also nudges audiences toward more intrusive alternatives: if signals intelligence can’t do it, maybe you need more human intelligence, more informants, more pressure on communities, more latitude to detain and question.
The context matters. North, a veteran of Cold War-era operations and a central figure in Iran-Contra, speaks from a worldview where covert networks and deniable logistics are the norm. His credibility trades on combat pragmatism, but his history also shadows the statement: “couriers” evoke a politics of secrecy in which information moves off-grid precisely to evade oversight. The line is less a warning about terrorists than a reminder that power, too, prefers messages that can’t be intercepted.
Quote Details
| Topic | Privacy & Cybersecurity |
|---|
More Quotes by Oliver
Add to List