"The thickness of the walls should be sufficient for two armed men to pass each other with ease"
About this Quote
At first glance, it reads like a fussy construction note. Then the blade flashes: Vitruvius is designing space around violence as a routine logistical problem. “Two armed men” isn’t colorful garnish; it’s the unit of measure for a world where the built environment is inseparable from state power, private security, and the expectation of conflict. The wall isn’t just a boundary. It’s a corridor for force.
The specific intent is practical and almost bureaucratic: specify a thickness that allows movement, circulation, and readiness. A wall that’s merely thick is wasted mass; a wall that’s thick enough to function as a passage becomes infrastructure. Vitruvius is thinking in systems: defenses that double as routes, architecture as an instrument that anticipates how bodies will behave under pressure.
The subtext is Roman confidence shaded with paranoia. This is an empire that prides itself on order, yet plans for disorder down to the width of a shoulder. The phrasing also normalizes militarization: the “ease” matters. Violence, in this frame, is not an emergency but a workflow. It’s the ancient version of designing cities for patrol cars, not pedestrians.
Context sharpens it. Vitruvius writes in an era of political turbulence and consolidation, when fortifications, roads, and civic buildings were expressions of stability and control. His line exposes what architecture often tries to hide: buildings encode a society’s fears and priorities. Here, safety isn’t a feeling; it’s a clearance requirement.
The specific intent is practical and almost bureaucratic: specify a thickness that allows movement, circulation, and readiness. A wall that’s merely thick is wasted mass; a wall that’s thick enough to function as a passage becomes infrastructure. Vitruvius is thinking in systems: defenses that double as routes, architecture as an instrument that anticipates how bodies will behave under pressure.
The subtext is Roman confidence shaded with paranoia. This is an empire that prides itself on order, yet plans for disorder down to the width of a shoulder. The phrasing also normalizes militarization: the “ease” matters. Violence, in this frame, is not an emergency but a workflow. It’s the ancient version of designing cities for patrol cars, not pedestrians.
Context sharpens it. Vitruvius writes in an era of political turbulence and consolidation, when fortifications, roads, and civic buildings were expressions of stability and control. His line exposes what architecture often tries to hide: buildings encode a society’s fears and priorities. Here, safety isn’t a feeling; it’s a clearance requirement.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Marcus Vitruvius Pollio, De Architectura (Ten Books on Architecture) — passage on wall thickness commonly translated as 'the walls should be so thick that two armed men can pass each other with ease'. |
More Quotes by Marcus
Add to List
