"The thing about rights is that in the end you can't prove what should be considered a right"
About this Quote
Rights occupy a strange space between law, morality, and politics. They are not the kind of claims that can be demonstrated the way a theorem can, or verified like a lab result. They are normative commitments, declarations about what we owe one another, and so they resist proof in the strict sense. Yet they are among the most powerful ideas humans have invented, precisely because they mobilize institutions, movements, and imaginations.
Paul Farmer knew this from the trenches of global health. As a physician-anthropologist who argued that health care is a human right, he confronted a world that often asked for proof before compassion: prove that the poor deserve antiretrovirals, prove that rural clinics are cost-effective, prove that some need should count as a right. His point is not that rights are arbitrary, but that they cannot be derived from empirical evidence alone. Statistics can show preventable suffering and the efficacy of interventions; they cannot by themselves dictate that people are owed care. That shift from is to ought requires ethical conviction and collective will.
The history of rights bears this out. Natural rights philosophers claimed self-evidence; modern declarations assert universality; courts codify and adjudicate. Still, every right has been argued into existence, fought for, and translated into concrete arrangements: schools, vaccines, legal protections, safe housing. The warrant for rights comes from human vulnerability and equality, from narratives of injustice, from solidarity, not from proof in the scientific sense.
Farmer’s realism cuts both ways. If rights cannot be proven, they must be persuaded, enacted, defended. Relying on proof becomes a weapon for those who benefit from the status quo. The antidote is pragmatic solidarity: act as if the right is real, build the systems that make it tangible, gather evidence to refine practice, and keep widening the circle of those who agree. Rights endure not because they are provable, but because enough people decide to live as though they are nonnegotiable, and then make that decision material in the lives of others.
Paul Farmer knew this from the trenches of global health. As a physician-anthropologist who argued that health care is a human right, he confronted a world that often asked for proof before compassion: prove that the poor deserve antiretrovirals, prove that rural clinics are cost-effective, prove that some need should count as a right. His point is not that rights are arbitrary, but that they cannot be derived from empirical evidence alone. Statistics can show preventable suffering and the efficacy of interventions; they cannot by themselves dictate that people are owed care. That shift from is to ought requires ethical conviction and collective will.
The history of rights bears this out. Natural rights philosophers claimed self-evidence; modern declarations assert universality; courts codify and adjudicate. Still, every right has been argued into existence, fought for, and translated into concrete arrangements: schools, vaccines, legal protections, safe housing. The warrant for rights comes from human vulnerability and equality, from narratives of injustice, from solidarity, not from proof in the scientific sense.
Farmer’s realism cuts both ways. If rights cannot be proven, they must be persuaded, enacted, defended. Relying on proof becomes a weapon for those who benefit from the status quo. The antidote is pragmatic solidarity: act as if the right is real, build the systems that make it tangible, gather evidence to refine practice, and keep widening the circle of those who agree. Rights endure not because they are provable, but because enough people decide to live as though they are nonnegotiable, and then make that decision material in the lives of others.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List
