"The thing is, continuity of strategic direction and continuous improvement in how you do things are absolutely consistent with each other. In fact, they're mutually reinforcing"
About this Quote
Porter is taking aim at a familiar corporate self-deception: the idea that you either pick a strategy or you “stay agile,” as if long-term direction and day-to-day improvement are rival factions. His line has the snap of a rebuttal. Continuity isn’t rigidity; it’s a commitment to a particular way of winning. Improvement isn’t drift; it’s how you get better at the chosen game.
The intent is corrective, almost disciplinary. Porter’s broader work argues that strategy is about trade-offs and positioning, not motivational slogans or operational excellence alone. In that context, “continuous improvement” (the language of Lean, Six Sigma, Kaizen) can become a seductive substitute for strategy: companies obsess over efficiency and best practices while quietly converging on the same offerings as everyone else. Porter’s subtext: if your improvements don’t deepen your distinctive value proposition, you’re just optimizing your way into commoditization.
The phrase “mutually reinforcing” is doing heavy lifting. A stable strategic direction gives improvement a filter: what to fix, what to ignore, what to stop doing even if it’s “working.” Continuous improvement, in turn, keeps continuity from becoming nostalgia; it stress-tests the strategy through execution, feedback, and learning. The cultural context here is late-20th-century management’s oscillation between grand visions and process religion. Porter is insisting that the grown-up version of leadership is holding both: the steadiness to choose, and the humility to refine.
The intent is corrective, almost disciplinary. Porter’s broader work argues that strategy is about trade-offs and positioning, not motivational slogans or operational excellence alone. In that context, “continuous improvement” (the language of Lean, Six Sigma, Kaizen) can become a seductive substitute for strategy: companies obsess over efficiency and best practices while quietly converging on the same offerings as everyone else. Porter’s subtext: if your improvements don’t deepen your distinctive value proposition, you’re just optimizing your way into commoditization.
The phrase “mutually reinforcing” is doing heavy lifting. A stable strategic direction gives improvement a filter: what to fix, what to ignore, what to stop doing even if it’s “working.” Continuous improvement, in turn, keeps continuity from becoming nostalgia; it stress-tests the strategy through execution, feedback, and learning. The cultural context here is late-20th-century management’s oscillation between grand visions and process religion. Porter is insisting that the grown-up version of leadership is holding both: the steadiness to choose, and the humility to refine.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List
